Menu
GWAS Study

Genome-wide meta-analysis of 158,000 individuals of European ancestry identifies three loci associated with chronic back pain.

Suri P, Palmer MR, Tsepilov YA et al.

30261039 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
441777 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

SP
Suri P
PM
Palmer MR
TY
Tsepilov YA
FM
Freidin MB
BC
Boer CG
YM
Yau MS
ED
Evans DS
GA
Gelemanovic A
BT
Bartz TM
NM
Nethander M
AL
Arbeeva L
KL
Karssen L
NT
Neogi T
CA
Campbell A
MD
Mellstrom D
OC
Ohlsson C
ML
Marshall LM
OE
Orwoll E
UA
Uitterlinden A
RJ
Rotter JI
LG
Lauc G
PB
Psaty BM
KM
Karlsson MK
LN
Lane NE
JG
Jarvik GP
PO
Polasek O
HM
Hochberg M
JJ
Jordan JM
VM
Van Meurs JBJ
JR
Jackson R
NC
Nielson CM
MB
Mitchell BD
SB
Smith BH
HC
Hayward C
SN
Smith NL
AY
Aulchenko YS
WF
Williams FMK
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Back pain is the #1 cause of years lived with disability worldwide, yet surprisingly little is known regarding the biology underlying this symptom. We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis of chronic back pain (CBP). Adults of European ancestry were included from 15 cohorts in the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) consortium, and from the UK Biobank interim data release. CBP cases were defined as those reporting back pain present for ≥3-6 months; non-cases were included as comparisons ("controls"). Each cohort conducted genotyping using commercially available arrays followed by imputation. GWAS used logistic regression models with additive genetic effects, adjusting for age, sex, study-specific covariates, and population substructure. The threshold for genome-wide significance in the fixed-effect inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis was p<5×10(-8). Suggestive (p<5×10(-7)) and genome-wide significant (p<5×10(-8)) variants were carried forward for replication or further investigation in the remaining UK Biobank participants not included in the discovery sample. The discovery sample comprised 158,025 individuals, including 29,531 CBP cases. A genome-wide significant association was found for the intronic variant rs12310519 in SOX5 (OR 1.08, p = 7.2×10(-10)). This was subsequently replicated in 283,752 UK Biobank participants not included in the discovery sample, including 50,915 cases (OR 1.06, p = 5.3×10(-11)), and exceeded genome-wide significance in joint meta-analysis (OR 1.07, p = 4.5×10(-19)). We found suggestive associations at three other loci in the discovery sample, two of which exceeded genome-wide significance in joint meta-analysis: an intergenic variant, rs7833174, located between CCDC26 and GSDMC (OR 1.05, p = 4.4×10(-13)), and an intronic variant, rs4384683, in DCC (OR 0.97, p = 2.4×10(-10)). In this first reported meta-analysis of GWAS for CBP, we identified and replicated a genetic locus associated with CBP (SOX5). We also identified 2 other loci that reached genome-wide significance in a 2-stage joint meta-analysis (CCDC26/GSDMC and DCC).

29,531 European ancestry cases, 128,494 European ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

441777
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
Yes
Replicated
50,915 British ancestry cases, 232,837 British ancestry controls
Replication Participants
European
Ancestry
U.K., U.S., Netherlands, Sweden, Croatia
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.