Menu
Currency
GWAS Study

Genome-wide association study of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis reveals genomic loci stratified by ANCA status.

Lyons PA, Peters JE, Alberici F et al.

31719529 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
7011 Participants
155 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

LP
Lyons PA
PJ
Peters JE
AF
Alberici F
LJ
Liley J
CR
Coulson RMR
AW
Astle W
BC
Baldini C
BF
Bonatti F
CM
Cid MC
EH
Elding H
EG
Emmi G
EJ
Epplen J
GL
Guillevin L
JD
Jayne DRW
JT
Jiang T
GI
Gunnarsson I
LP
Lamprecht P
LS
Leslie S
LM
Little MA
MD
Martorana D
MF
Moosig F
NT
Neumann T
OS
Ohlsson S
QS
Quickert S
RG
Ramirez GA
RB
Rewerska B
SG
Schett G
SR
Sinico RA
SW
Szczeklik W
TV
Tesar V
VD
Vukcevic D
TB
Terrier B
WR
Watts RA
VA
Vaglio A
HJ
Holle JU
WC
Wallace C
SK
Smith KGC
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a rare inflammatory disease of unknown cause. 30% of patients have anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) specific for myeloperoxidase (MPO). Here, we describe a genome-wide association study in 676 EGPA cases and 6809 controls, that identifies 4 EGPA-associated loci through conventional case-control analysis, and 4 additional associations through a conditional false discovery rate approach. Many variants are also associated with asthma and six are associated with eosinophil count in the general population. Through Mendelian randomisation, we show that a primary tendency to eosinophilia contributes to EGPA susceptibility. Stratification by ANCA reveals that EGPA comprises two genetically and clinically distinct syndromes. MPO+ ANCA EGPA is an eosinophilic autoimmune disease sharing certain clinical features and an HLA-DQ association with MPO+ ANCA-associated vasculitis, while ANCA-negative EGPA may instead have a mucosal/barrier dysfunction origin. Four candidate genes are targets of therapies in development, supporting their exploration in EGPA.

159 European ancestry cases, 6,688 European ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

7011
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
Yes
Replicated
43 European and unknown ancestry cases, 121 European and unknown ancestry controls
Replication Participants
European, European, NR
Ancestry
France, Germany, Czech Republic, Poland, Republic of Ireland, Sweden, U.K., Italy, Spain
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

AI-Generated Summary

AI-generated by DNAGENICS

Independent AI summary of health and genetic findings from the published study

Important: This summary is AI-generated by DNAGENICS for informational purposes only. It was not created by, affiliated with, or endorsed by the researchers behind the original publication, and is based solely on that published research. It may contain errors or omissions. DNAGENICS disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies or consequences arising from use of this information. Verify all information against the original publication. This is not professional scientific review or medical advice.

AI Summary In Progress

Our AI-generated summary of this publication is being prepared. Please check back soon.