Menu
GWAS Study

Genome-wide association study of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis reveals genomic loci stratified by ANCA status.

Lyons PA, Peters JE, Alberici F et al.

31719529 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
7011 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

LP
Lyons PA
PJ
Peters JE
AF
Alberici F
LJ
Liley J
CR
Coulson RMR
AW
Astle W
BC
Baldini C
BF
Bonatti F
CM
Cid MC
EH
Elding H
EG
Emmi G
EJ
Epplen J
GL
Guillevin L
JD
Jayne DRW
JT
Jiang T
GI
Gunnarsson I
LP
Lamprecht P
LS
Leslie S
LM
Little MA
MD
Martorana D
MF
Moosig F
NT
Neumann T
OS
Ohlsson S
QS
Quickert S
RG
Ramirez GA
RB
Rewerska B
SG
Schett G
SR
Sinico RA
SW
Szczeklik W
TV
Tesar V
VD
Vukcevic D
TB
Terrier B
WR
Watts RA
VA
Vaglio A
HJ
Holle JU
WC
Wallace C
SK
Smith KGC
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a rare inflammatory disease of unknown cause. 30% of patients have anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) specific for myeloperoxidase (MPO). Here, we describe a genome-wide association study in 676 EGPA cases and 6809 controls, that identifies 4 EGPA-associated loci through conventional case-control analysis, and 4 additional associations through a conditional false discovery rate approach. Many variants are also associated with asthma and six are associated with eosinophil count in the general population. Through Mendelian randomisation, we show that a primary tendency to eosinophilia contributes to EGPA susceptibility. Stratification by ANCA reveals that EGPA comprises two genetically and clinically distinct syndromes. MPO+ ANCA EGPA is an eosinophilic autoimmune disease sharing certain clinical features and an HLA-DQ association with MPO+ ANCA-associated vasculitis, while ANCA-negative EGPA may instead have a mucosal/barrier dysfunction origin. Four candidate genes are targets of therapies in development, supporting their exploration in EGPA.

159 European ancestry cases, 6,688 European ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

7011
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
Yes
Replicated
43 European and unknown ancestry cases, 121 European and unknown ancestry controls
Replication Participants
European, European, NR
Ancestry
France, Germany, Czech Republic, Poland, Republic of Ireland, Sweden, U.K., Italy, Spain
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.