Menu
GWAS Study

Shared and distinct genetic etiologies for different types of clonal hematopoiesis.

Brown DW, Cato LD, Zhao Y et al.

37684235 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
482378 Participants
0 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

BD
Brown DW
CL
Cato LD
ZY
Zhao Y
NS
Nandakumar SK
BE
Bao EL
GE
Gardner EJ
HA
Hubbard AK
DA
DePaulis A
RT
Rehling T
SL
Song L
YK
Yu K
CS
Chanock SJ
PJ
Perry JRB
SV
Sankaran VG
MM
Machiela MJ
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH)-age-related expansion of mutated hematopoietic clones-can differ in frequency and cellular fitness by CH type (e.g., mutations in driver genes (CHIP), gains/losses and copy-neutral loss of chromosomal segments (mCAs), and loss of sex chromosomes). Co-occurring CH raises questions as to their origin, selection, and impact. We integrate sequence and genotype array data in up to 482,378 UK Biobank participants to demonstrate shared genetic architecture across CH types. Our analysis suggests a cellular evolutionary trade-off between different types of CH, with LOY occurring at lower rates in individuals carrying mutations in established CHIP genes. We observed co-occurrence of CHIP and mCAs with overlap at TET2, DNMT3A, and JAK2, in which CHIP precedes mCA acquisition. Furthermore, individuals carrying overlapping CH had high risk of future lymphoid and myeloid malignancies. Finally, we leverage shared genetic architecture of CH traits to identify 15 novel loci associated with leukemia risk.

at least 1,427 cases, at least 480,951 controls (MTAG boosted by telomere length and loss of chromosome Y samples)

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

482378
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
U.K.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.