Menu
GWAS Study

ADuLT: An efficient and robust time-to-event GWAS.

Pedersen EM, Agerbo E, Plana-Ripoll O et al.

37689771 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
58286 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

PE
Pedersen EM
AE
Agerbo E
PO
Plana-Ripoll O
SJ
Steinbach J
KM
Krebs MD
HD
Hougaard DM
WT
Werge T
NM
Nordentoft M
BA
Børglum AD
MK
Musliner KL
GA
Ganna A
SA
Schork AJ
MP
Mortensen PB
MJ
McGrath JJ
PF
Privé F
VB
Vilhjálmsson BJ
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Proportional hazards models have been proposed to analyse time-to-event phenotypes in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, little is known about the ability of proportional hazards models to identify genetic associations under different generative models and when ascertainment is present. Here we propose the age-dependent liability threshold (ADuLT) model as an alternative to a Cox regression based GWAS, here represented by SPACox. We compare ADuLT, SPACox, and standard case-control GWAS in simulations under two generative models and with varying degrees of ascertainment as well as in the iPSYCH cohort. We find Cox regression GWAS to be underpowered when cases are strongly ascertained (cases are oversampled by a factor 5), regardless of the generative model used. ADuLT is robust to ascertainment in all simulated scenarios. Then, we analyse four psychiatric disorders in iPSYCH, ADHD, Autism, Depression, and Schizophrenia, with a strong case-ascertainment. Across these psychiatric disorders, ADuLT identifies 20 independent genome-wide significant associations, case-control GWAS finds 17, and SPACox finds 8, which is consistent with simulation results. As more genetic data are being linked to electronic health records, robust GWAS methods that can make use of age-of-onset information will help increase power in analyses for common health outcomes.

58,286 European ancestry individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

58286
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
Denmark
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.