Menu
GWAS Study

Pan-UK Biobank genome-wide association analyses enhance discovery and resolution of ancestry-enriched effects.

Karczewski KJ, Gupta R, Kanai M et al.

40968291 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
371343 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

KK
Karczewski KJ
GR
Gupta R
KM
Kanai M
LW
Lu W
TK
Tsuo K
WY
Wang Y
WR
Walters RK
TP
Turley P
CS
Callier S
SN
Shah NN
BN
Baya N
PD
Palmer DS
GJ
Goldstein JI
SG
Sarma G
SM
Solomonson M
CN
Cheng N
BS
Bryant S
CC
Churchhouse C
CC
Cusick CM
PT
Poterba T
CJ
Compitello J
KD
King D
ZW
Zhou W
SC
Seed C
FH
Finucane HK
DM
Daly MJ
NB
Neale BM
AE
Atkinson EG
MA
Martin AR
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Large biobanks, such as the UK Biobank (UKB), enable massive phenome by genome-wide association studies that elucidate genetic etiology of complex traits. However, people from diverse genetic ancestry groups are often excluded from association analyses due to concerns about population structure introducing false positive associations. Here we generate mixed model associations and meta-analyses across genetic ancestry groups, inclusive of a larger fraction of the UK Biobank than previous efforts, to produce freely available summary statistics for 7,266 traits. We build a quality control and analysis framework informed by genetic architecture. Overall, we identify 14,676 significant loci (P < 5 × 10-8) in the meta-analysis that were not found in the EUR genetic ancestry group alone, including new associations, for example between CAMK2D and triglycerides. We also highlight associations from ancestry-enriched variation, including a known pleiotropic missense variant in G6PD associated with several biomarker traits. We release these results publicly alongside frequently asked questions that describe caveats for interpretation of results, enhancing available resources for interpretation of risk variants across diverse populations.

121,257 European ancestry cases, 250,086 European ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

371343
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European, South Asian, Central Asian, Greater Middle Eastern (Middle Eastern, North African or Persian), East Asian, African unspecified
Ancestry
U.K.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.