Menu
GWAS Study

Genetic analyses of diverse populations improves discovery for complex traits.

Wojcik GL, Graff M, Nishimura KK et al.

31217584 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
49796 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

WG
Wojcik GL
GM
Graff M
NK
Nishimura KK
TR
Tao R
HJ
Haessler J
GC
Gignoux CR
HH
Highland HM
PY
Patel YM
SE
Sorokin EP
AC
Avery CL
BG
Belbin GM
BS
Bien SA
CI
Cheng I
CS
Cullina S
HC
Hodonsky CJ
HY
Hu Y
HL
Huckins LM
JJ
Jeff J
JA
Justice AE
KJ
Kocarnik JM
LU
Lim U
LB
Lin BM
LY
Lu Y
NS
Nelson SC
PS
Park SL
PH
Poisner H
PM
Preuss MH
RM
Richard MA
SC
Schurmann C
SV
Setiawan VW
SA
Sockell A
VK
Vahi K
VM
Verbanck M
VA
Vishnu A
WR
Walker RW
YK
Young KL
ZN
Zubair N
AV
Acuña-Alonso V
AJ
Ambite JL
BK
Barnes KC
BE
Boerwinkle E
BE
Bottinger EP
BC
Bustamante CD
CC
Caberto C
CS
Canizales-Quinteros S
CM
Conomos MP
DE
Deelman E
DR
Do R
DK
Doheny K
FL
Fernández-Rhodes L
FM
Fornage M
HB
Hailu B
HG
Heiss G
HB
Henn BM
HL
Hindorff LA
JR
Jackson RD
LC
Laurie CA
LC
Laurie CC
LY
Li Y
LD
Lin DY
MA
Moreno-Estrada A
NG
Nadkarni G
NP
Norman PJ
PL
Pooler LC
RA
Reiner AP
RJ
Romm J
SC
Sabatti C
SK
Sandoval K
SX
Sheng X
SE
Stahl EA
SD
Stram DO
TT
Thornton TA
WC
Wassel CL
WL
Wilkens LR
WC
Winkler CA
YS
Yoneyama S
BS
Buyske S
HC
Haiman CA
KC
Kooperberg C
LM
Le Marchand L
LR
Loos RJF
MT
Matise TC
NK
North KE
PU
Peters U
KE
Kenny EE
CC
Carlson CS
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have laid the foundation for investigations into the biology of complex traits, drug development and clinical guidelines. However, the majority of discovery efforts are based on data from populations of European ancestry1-3. In light of the differential genetic architecture that is known to exist between populations, bias in representation can exacerbate existing disease and healthcare disparities. Critical variants may be missed if they have a low frequency or are completely absent in European populations, especially as the field shifts its attention towards rare variants, which are more likely to be population-specific4-10. Additionally, effect sizes and their derived risk prediction scores derived in one population may not accurately extrapolate to other populations11,12. Here we demonstrate the value of diverse, multi-ethnic participants in large-scale genomic studies. The Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) study conducted a GWAS of 26 clinical and behavioural phenotypes in 49,839 non-European individuals. Using strategies tailored for analysis of multi-ethnic and admixed populations, we describe a framework for analysing diverse populations, identify 27 novel loci and 38 secondary signals at known loci, as well as replicate 1,444 GWAS catalogue associations across these traits. Our data show evidence of effect-size heterogeneity across ancestries for published GWAS associations, substantial benefits for fine-mapping using diverse cohorts and insights into clinical implications. In the United States-where minority populations have a disproportionately higher burden of chronic conditions13-the lack of representation of diverse populations in genetic research will result in inequitable access to precision medicine for those with the highest burden of disease. We strongly advocate for continued, large genome-wide efforts in diverse populations to maximize genetic discovery and reduce health disparities.

17,286 African American individuals, 22,192 Hispanic/Latino individuals, 4,680 Asian ancestry individuals, 3,939 Native Hawaiian ancestry individuals, 647 Native American ancestry individuals, 1,052 individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

49796
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
Native American, Hispanic or Latin American, Oceanian, African American or Afro-Caribbean, East Asian, Asian unspecified, European
Ancestry
U.S.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.