Menu
GWAS Study

Multi-ancestry genome-wide association study of major depression aids locus discovery, fine mapping, gene prioritization and causal inference.

Meng X, Navoly G, Giannakopoulou O et al.

38177345 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
1820689 Participants
132 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

MX
Meng X
NG
Navoly G
GO
Giannakopoulou O
LD
Levey DF
KD
Koller D
PG
Pathak GA
KN
Koen N
LK
Lin K
AM
Adams MJ
RM
Rentería ME
FY
Feng Y
GJ
Gaziano JM
SD
Stein DJ
ZH
Zar HJ
CM
Campbell ML
VH
van Heel DA
TB
Trivedi B
FS
Finer S
MA
McQuillin A
BN
Bass N
CV
Chundru VK
MH
Martin HC
HQ
Huang QQ
VM
Valkovskaya M
CC
Chu CY
KS
Kanjira S
KP
Kuo PH
CH
Chen HC
TS
Tsai SJ
LY
Liu YL
KK
Kendler KS
PR
Peterson RE
CN
Cai N
FY
Fang Y
SS
Sen S
SL
Scott LJ
BM
Burmeister M
LR
Loos RJF
PM
Preuss MH
AK
Actkins KV
DL
Davis LK
UM
Uddin M
WA
Wani AH
WD
Wildman DE
AA
Aiello AE
UR
Ursano RJ
KR
Kessler RC
KM
Kanai M
OY
Okada Y
SS
Sakaue S
RJ
Rabinowitz JA
MB
Maher BS
UG
Uhl G
EW
Eaton W
CC
Cruz-Fuentes CS
MG
Martinez-Levy GA
CA
Campos AI
MI
Millwood IY
CZ
Chen Z
LL
Li L
WS
Wassertheil-Smoller S
JY
Jiang Y
TC
Tian C
MN
Martin NG
MB
Mitchell BL
BE
Byrne EM
AS
Awasthi S
CJ
Coleman JRI
RS
Ripke S
ST
Sofer T
WR
Walters RG
MA
McIntosh AM
PR
Polimanti R
DE
Dunn EC
SM
Stein MB
GJ
Gelernter J
LC
Lewis CM
KK
Kuchenbaecker K
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Most genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of major depression (MD) have been conducted in samples of European ancestry. Here we report a multi-ancestry GWAS of MD, adding data from 21 cohorts with 88,316 MD cases and 902,757 controls to previously reported data. This analysis used a range of measures to define MD and included samples of African (36% of effective sample size), East Asian (26%) and South Asian (6%) ancestry and Hispanic/Latin American participants (32%). The multi-ancestry GWAS identified 53 significantly associated novel loci. For loci from GWAS in European ancestry samples, fewer than expected were transferable to other ancestry groups. Fine mapping benefited from additional sample diversity. A transcriptome-wide association study identified 205 significantly associated novel genes. These findings suggest that, for MD, increasing ancestral and global diversity in genetic studies may be particularly important to ensure discovery of core genes and inform about transferability of findings.

258,364 European ancestry cases, 571,252 European ancestry controls, 36,818 African ancestry cases, 161,679 African ancestry controls, 21,980 East Asian ancestry cases, 360,956 East Asian ancestry controls, 4,505 South Asian ancestry cases, 27,176 South Asian ancestry controls, 25,013 Hispanic or Latin American cases, 352,946 Hispanic or Latin American controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

1820689
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European, African unspecified, East Asian, South Asian, Hispanic or Latin American
Ancestry
Australia, U.S., South Africa, U.K., China, Japan, Taiwan, Mexico, Peru
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.