Preparing for shotgun sequencing in forensic genetics - Benchmarking of tools for read mapping, genotype calling, and imputation.
Jepsen Alberte Honoré, AH Poggiali, Brando B et al.
Publication Details
Comprehensive information about this research publication
Abstract
Summary of the research findings
Shotgun sequencing has emerged as a powerful tool in forensic genetics, as it allows for comprehensive genetic profiles to be generated from highly degraded DNA. The method enables simultaneous access to a wide range of markers, thereby supporting applications such as human identification (HID), DNA intelligence, and forensic investigative genetic genealogy (FIGG). However, the accuracy and utility of shotgun sequencing data are highly dependent on the bioinformatic analysis. In this study, we benchmarked widely used bioinformatic tools using shotgun sequencing data from both high-quality (blood and buccal) and low-quality (hair) forensic samples. Specifically, we evaluated five alignment algorithms (Bowtie2, BWA-ALN, BWA-MEM, CLC, and CLC LightSpeed), four genotype calling methods (ANGSD, ATLAS, GATK HaplotypeCaller, and a custom rule-based approach), and three imputation methods (Beagle4.1, Beagle5.4, and GLIMPSE2). All investigated tools were found to be suitable for analysing high-quality reference samples. However, their performance varied significantly when applied to low-quality (hair) forensic samples. The combination of BWA-MEM, ANGSD, or GATK HaplotypeCaller, and imputation with GLIMPSE2 produced the lowest degree of discordance. The work presented here emphasises the importance of informed bioinformatic tool selection and optimisation, and it provides practical recommendations for analysing shotgun sequencing data in forensic genetics.
AI-Generated Summary
AI-generated by DNAGENICSIndependent AI summary of ancestry and genetic findings from the published study
Important: This summary is AI-generated by DNAGENICS for informational purposes only. It was not created by, affiliated with, or endorsed by the researchers behind the original publication, and is based solely on that published research. It may contain errors or omissions. DNAGENICS disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies or consequences arising from use of this information. Verify all information against the original publication. This is not professional scientific review or medical advice.