A SNP panel for co-analysis of capture and shotgun ancient DNA data
Fournier, R., Pearson Fulton, A., Reich, D. E.
Publication Details
Comprehensive information about this research publication
Abstract
Summary of the research findings
Advances in technology have decreased the cost of generating genetic variation data from ancient people, resulting in exponentially increasing numbers of individuals with whole genome data. However, each technology comes with platform-specific biases, limiting co-analyzability of individuals sequenced with different technologies as well as joint analysis of modern and ancient individuals. We present a method to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with minimal technology-specific bias. Leveraging data from over 17,000 ancient individuals, we apply this method to identify a set of more than a million SNPs that we call the "Compatibility" panel, and which has been effectively assayed in a large fraction of ancient human DNA experiments published to date. We also identify a subset of these SNPs, the "Compatibility-HO" panel, which further restricts to positions that have been assayed in more than ten thousand modern individuals from more than a thousand diverse populations using the Affymetrix Human Origins (HO) genotyping array. The Compatibility panel reduces spurious Z-scores due to different sequencing platforms by nearly an order of magnitude, while retaining around 70-90% of statistical power for f-statistic analysis.
AI-Generated Summary
AI-generated by DNAGENICSIndependent AI summary of ancestry and genetic findings from the published study
Important: This summary is AI-generated by DNAGENICS for informational purposes only. It was not created by, affiliated with, or endorsed by the researchers behind the original publication, and is based solely on that published research. It may contain errors or omissions. DNAGENICS disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies or consequences arising from use of this information. Verify all information against the original publication. This is not professional scientific review or medical advice.