Skip to main content
mtDNA · Maternal lineage

Y1

mtDNA Haplogroup Y1

A reference profile for one lineage branch. Shared haplogroups do not establish a family relationship or cultural identity.

Reference profile

Branch background

Historical context for mtDNA lineage branch Y1

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup Y1 is a branch of the broader haplogroup Y, which itself appears to have diversified in the early Holocene after an origin in Southeast/East Asia. Y1 likely split from other Y lineages during the early to mid-Holocene (roughly ~8 kya in this estimate), in populations occupying northeastern parts of East Asia and the northwestern Pacific coast. Its emergence fits the pattern of Holocene mitochondrial diversification that accompanied postglacial population expansions, coastal adaptations, and increased regional structure in northern East Asia and adjacent Siberia.

Phylogenetically, Y1 sits under the parent clade Y and gives rise to multiple downstream sublineages (often labelled in the literature as Y1a, Y1b, etc.), with further substructure recognized as more complete mitochondrial genomes have been sampled. The timing and branching order of these subclades continue to be refined as more whole-mtDNA sequences and ancient DNA data are published.

Subclades

  • Y1a, Y1b (and further sub-lineages): Published population surveys and mitogenome studies report multiple Y1-derived subclades; some show local enrichment (for example, specific Y1a subbranches in Japan/Hokkaido and small clades in the Russian Far East).
  • Phylogenetic uncertainty: While control-region screening can identify Y1-affiliated samples, robust assignment to subclades requires complete mitogenomes. As a result, cataloguing of Y1 substructure is ongoing and subject to revision.

Geographical Distribution

Haplogroup Y1 is geographically concentrated in the northwestern Pacific and adjacent inland regions:

  • It is found at appreciable frequencies among some populations of the Russian Far East and Siberia (particularly groups associated with the lower Amur, Sakhalin and Kamchatka regions).
  • In Japan, Y1 and its subclades have been reported in modern samples, and ancient DNA work has identified Y-lineages consistent with Jomon-related ancestry, suggesting continuity or repeated inputs into the archipelago.
  • Low-frequency occurrences are reported in peninsular Korea and in parts of Northeast China.
  • Very rare occurrences have been documented in Southeast Asian populations and, at very low frequency, among some Indigenous North American groups — consistent with a Beringian/Coastal connection but not implying a major founding contribution.

The overall picture is of a haplogroup with a northern/coastal East Asian focus and scattered low-frequency presence elsewhere.

Historical and Cultural Significance

  • Jomon and coastal hunter-gatherers: Y1's distribution and presence in ancient north Pacific samples makes it relevant to debates on the genetic makeup of Jomon-period populations in Japan and related coastal hunter-gatherer groups across the Russian Far East.
  • Postglacial movements: The timing and regional concentration of Y1 are consistent with postglacial recolonization of high-latitude coastal zones and the establishment of specialized maritime adaptations in the early Holocene.
  • Minor role in American peopling: Its rare presence in some Native American samples suggests limited diffusion across Beringia or later back-and-forth gene flow, rather than a primary founding lineage in the Americas.

Conclusion

mtDNA haplogroup Y1 is a moderately young Holocene lineage nested within haplogroup Y, best described as a regional marker of northeastern East Asia and the northwestern Pacific Rim. It is useful in studies of Holocene population structure, coastal/riverine adaptations, and regional continuity (for example, Jomon-related ancestry in Japan and neighbouring mainland and island groups). Continued whole-mitochondrial sequencing and ancient DNA sampling in Siberia, the Russian Far East, and northern Japan will refine the internal phylogeny of Y1 and clarify its role in postglacial dispersals.

Key Points

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Reference profile

Tree & Relationships

Phylogenetic context and subclades

Evolution Path

Follow the recorded parent branches toward Y1. Dates are estimates and can change as reference data is revised.

Steps Haplogroup Age Estimate Archaeology Era Time Passed Immediate Descendants Tested Modern Descendants Ancient Connections
1 Y1 Current ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 years 2 7 1
2 Y ~11,000 years ago Neolithic 11,000 years 2 26 0
3 N9 ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 years 3 178 0
4 N ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 years 16 26,150 13
5 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 years 7 30,162 6
6 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
7 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
8 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
9 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
10 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
11 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 years 2 32,236 5

Siblings (1)

Other branches from the same parent haplogroup

Reference profile

Where in the World

Geographic distribution and modern presence

Recorded origin

Northeast Asia / Far East Siberia

Modern Distribution

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup Y1 is found include:

  1. Ainu and some populations of northern Japan (Hokkaido)
  2. Indigenous groups of the Russian Far East (e.g., Nivkh, Ulchi-area groups) and Sakhalin
  3. Siberian populations of the Amur and Kamchatka regions (occasional reports in Even, Evenk and related groups)
  4. Mainland East Asian populations at low–moderate frequency (select Japanese and Korean samples)
  5. Some Southeast Asian populations at low frequencies (scattered reports, reflecting deeper Y diversity)
  6. Very low-frequency occurrences in certain Native American samples (consistent with rare trans-Beringian connections)
Historical context

A branch through time

Estimated formation in a broad historical timeline. Period markers provide context and do not imply a connection with particular cultures.

  1. ~10k years ago

    Neolithic Revolution

    Agriculture begins, settled communities form

  2. ~8k years ago

    Haplogroup Y1

    Estimated formation of this mtDNA branch; dates and locations are reference estimates.

    This branch
  3. ~5k years ago

    Bronze Age

    Metalworking, writing, and early civilizations

  4. ~3k years ago

    Iron Age

    Iron tools, expanded trade networks

  5. ~2.5k years ago

    Classical Antiquity

    Greek and Roman civilizations flourish

  6. Present

    Present Day

    Modern era

Reference profile

Archaeological context

Recorded archaeological associations for mtDNA branch Y1

Recorded associations

These labels describe archaeological contexts recorded for reference samples linked to Y1. An association does not establish that all carriers belonged to a culture or followed a particular migration route.

Early Avar Gongguan Late Medieval Mongolian Mongol Tasmola
Culture assignments are based on archaeological context of ancient DNA samples and may represent regional associations during specific time periods.
Reference profile

Sample Catalog

1 subclade carrier of haplogroup Y1 (no direct carriers in the current reference selection)

1 shown · 1 matching samples

Portraits are AI-generated illustrations. Sample labels and accession IDs identify the reference records.

Portrait Sample Country Era Date Culture mtDNA Match
AI-generated illustrative portrait of Bulgan Late Medieval individual, Bulgan. Ulaan Kherem II, Mongolia (1,035-1,172 CE)
Sample ID: ULA001
Mongolia Mongolia Bulgan LateMedieval 1035-1172 calCE (928±23 BP, MAMS-41127) Late Medieval Mongolian Y1a Subclade
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Reference profile

Carrier Distribution Map

Geographic distribution of 1 ancient DNA sample (direct and subclade carriers of Y1)

Subclade carrier
Time Period Filter
All Time Periods
Showing all samples
Reference profile

Temporal Distribution

Distribution of carriers across archaeological periods

Reference profile

Geographic Distribution

Counts by recorded sample country. These reflect the available reference selection, not population frequencies.

Reference profile

Country × Era Distribution

Compare recorded sample counts across countries and archaeological periods. Select a populated cell to inspect a sample.

Data

Data & Provenance

Source information and data quality

Last Updated 2026-02-16
Confidence Score 50/100
Coverage Low

Data Source

Classification, estimated dates and geographic context reflect the recorded reference data and may change as evidence is revised. Sample coverage is uneven; recorded locations and archaeological associations do not establish personal origin or cultural identity.