Skip to main content
Y-DNA · Paternal lineage

E1B1A1A1A1C1A1A3A

Y-DNA Haplogroup E1B1A1A1A1C1A1A3A

A reference profile for one lineage branch. Shared haplogroups do not establish a family relationship or cultural identity.

Reference profile

Branch background

Historical context for Y-DNA lineage branch E1B1A1A1A1C1A1A3A

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup E1B1A1A1A1C1A1A3A is a very recently defined downstream branch of the widespread West/Central African lineage commonly referred to as E‑M2 (E1b1a). E‑M2 has deep roots in West Africa and rose to high frequency there and across much of sub‑Saharan Africa during the Holocene, in part associated with the spread of Bantu-speaking populations. The specific SNP-defined branch represented by E1B1A1A1A1C1A1A3A appears to have arisen within the last few hundred years as a product of a local founder effect or a short, rapid patrilineal expansion within particular clans or communities.

This shallow time depth means the clade is useful for forensic, genealogical, and recent population-history studies rather than for deep prehistory. Its recent origin also explains how the lineage can be concentrated in specific ethnic groups or geographic localities and show up at measurable frequencies in diaspora populations that experienced recent forced or voluntary migration.

Subclades (if applicable)

As a very downstream and recently named subclade, E1B1A1A1A1C1A1A3A is currently treated as a terminal or near-terminal branch in available public phylogenies. There may be few or no well-characterized downstream SNPs publicly reported yet; future high-coverage sequencing and community SNP discovery could identify additional child branches reflecting even more localized family/clan expansions. In genealogical practice, STR patterns linked to this SNP clade can help identify close kinship and recent shared ancestry among males who carry it.

Geographical Distribution

The geographic distribution of E1B1A1A1A1C1A1A3A mirrors that of its immediate parent and the wider E‑M2 family but at a finer, localized scale. It is most common in West and Central Africa where recent founder effects produced high local frequencies, and it is also observed among African-descended populations in the Caribbean and the Americas as a result of the transatlantic slave trade. Low-frequency occurrences in Europe and North America are generally attributable to recent migration and diaspora.

In population-genetic surveys this clade will often co-occur with other E‑M2-derived haplogroups and with regional autosomal ancestry components typical of West/Central Africa.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because of its very recent emergence, E1B1A1A1A1C1A1A3A is most informative about recent historical processes rather than deep prehistoric events. It likely marks:

  • Clan- or lineage-level expansions (for example, patrilineal kin groups that grew rapidly over a few generations).
  • Founder effects within particular ethnic groups, towns, or chieftaincies in West/Central Africa.
  • Diaspora signals resulting from the transatlantic slave trade and later migrations, where male descendants may retain this paternal marker.

For cultural and genealogical reconstruction, this haplogroup can therefore help connect living individuals to recent paternal ancestry within West/Central African communities and to trace lineages across the Atlantic in African-descended populations.

Conclusion

E1B1A1A1A1C1A1A3A is a very recently derived, geographically concentrated branch of the E‑M2 paternal family, best interpreted as evidence of recent founder events and localized patrilineal expansion in West/Central Africa with secondary representation in the Americas and Caribbean through historical migration. It is primarily relevant for recent population-history and genealogical analyses and may acquire additional substructure as further sequencing and SNP discovery efforts characterize more samples.

Key Points

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Reference profile

Tree & Relationships

Phylogenetic context and subclades

Evolution Path

Follow the recorded parent branches toward E1B1A1A1A1C1A1A3A. Dates are estimates and can change as reference data is revised.

Steps Haplogroup Age Estimate Archaeology Era Time Passed Immediate Descendants Tested Modern Descendants Ancient Connections
1 E1B1A1A1A1C1A1A3A Current ~80 years ago Modern <100 years 1 0 0
2 E1B1A1A1A1C1A1A3 ~100 years ago Modern 100 years 3 1 0
3 E1B1A1A1A1C1A1A ~200 years ago Modern 200 years 1 196 0
4 E1B1A1A1A1C1A1 ~500 years ago Modern 500 years 1 196 0
5 E1B1A1A1A1C1A ~800 years ago Medieval 800 years 1 204 0
6 E1B1A1A1A1C1 ~1,000 years ago Medieval 1,200 years 2 238 0
7 E1B1A1A1A1C ~2,000 years ago Roman Period 1,800 years 3 265 1
8 E1B1A1A1A1 ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,500 years 2 271 0
9 E1B1A1A1A ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 years 2 414 0
10 E1B1A1A1 ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 5,500 years 1 425 0
11 E1B1A1A ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 years 1 425 0
12 E1B1A1 ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 years 1 433 0
13 E1B1A ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 years 1 437 0
14 E1B1 ~28,000 years ago Paleolithic 28,000 years 2 1,572 0
15 E1B ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 years 1 1,583 0
16 E1 ~50,000 years ago Paleolithic 50,000 years 2 1,667 2
17 E ~50,000 years ago Paleolithic 50,000 years 3 1,813 3

Siblings (2)

Other branches from the same parent haplogroup

Reference profile

Where in the World

Geographic distribution and modern presence

Recorded origin

West/Central Africa

Modern Distribution

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup E1B1A1A1A1C1A1A3A is found include:

  1. Yoruba and other West African groups (e.g., Akan, Mande-speaking populations)
  2. Bantu-speaking populations across Central Africa (e.g., Kongo, Luba, Mbundu)
  3. Southern African Bantu groups at moderate frequencies (e.g., Zulu, Xhosa)
  4. Eastern African populations with Bantu ancestry (e.g., parts of Tanzania, Kenya, Great Lakes region)
  5. African-descended populations in the Americas and Caribbean (via the transatlantic slave trade)
  6. Low-frequency occurrences in southern Europe and North America due to recent migration and diaspora

Regional Presence

Western Africa High
Central Africa High
Southern Africa Moderate
Eastern Africa Low
Caribbean Moderate
South America Moderate
North America Low
Southern Europe Low
Historical context

A branch through time

Estimated formation in a broad historical timeline. Period markers provide context and do not imply a connection with particular cultures.

  1. ~10k years ago

    Neolithic Revolution

    Agriculture begins, settled communities form

  2. ~5k years ago

    Bronze Age

    Metalworking, writing, and early civilizations

  3. ~3k years ago

    Iron Age

    Iron tools, expanded trade networks

  4. ~2.5k years ago

    Classical Antiquity

    Greek and Roman civilizations flourish

  5. ~80 years ago

    Haplogroup E1B1A1A1A1C1A1A3A

    Estimated formation of this Y-DNA branch; dates and locations are reference estimates.

    This branch
  6. Present

    Present Day

    Modern era

Reference profile

Archaeological context

Recorded archaeological associations for Y-DNA branch E1B1A1A1A1C1A1A3A

Recorded associations

These labels describe archaeological contexts recorded for reference samples linked to E1B1A1A1A1C1A1A3A. An association does not establish that all carriers belonged to a culture or followed a particular migration route.

Afro-Mexican Iron Age Pastoral Modern Period Ngongo Mbata present
Culture assignments are based on archaeological context of ancient DNA samples and may represent regional associations during specific time periods.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Data

Data & Provenance

Source information and data quality

Last Updated 2026-06-15
Confidence Score 50/100
Coverage Low

Data Source

Classification, estimated dates and geographic context reflect the recorded reference data and may change as evidence is revised. Sample coverage is uneven; recorded locations and archaeological associations do not establish personal origin or cultural identity.