Skip to main content
Y-DNA · Paternal lineage

E1B1A1A1A1C1B

Y-DNA Haplogroup E1B1A1A1A1C1B

A reference profile for one lineage branch. Shared haplogroups do not establish a family relationship or cultural identity.

Reference profile

Branch background

Historical context for Y-DNA lineage branch E1B1A1A1A1C1B

Origins and Evolution

E1B1A1A1A1C1B is a downstream subclade of the broadly distributed E1b1a (E‑M2) paternal lineage that dominates many West, Central and parts of Southern African populations. Given its position beneath E1B1A1A1A1C1 and the parent clade's estimated time depth (~1.2 kya), E1B1A1A1A1C1B most plausibly arose within the last ~0.5–1.0 thousand years (0.5–1.0 kya). This time frame places its origin in the Late Holocene during periods of sustained regional demographic growth associated with Iron Age social changes and continued Bantu‑language expansions and local differentiation.

Genetically, E1B1A1A1A1C1B represents a recent private or regionally restricted SNP-defined branch that likely rose to detectable frequencies through localized population growth, founder effects, and subsequent gene flow. Like other recent E‑M2 subclades, its distribution reflects a mixture of deep West/Central African ancestry and more recent historical movements, including long‑distance migrations and the transatlantic slave trade.

Subclades

At present E1B1A1A1A1C1B appears to be a terminal or very shallow terminal clade in public phylogenies, with few well‑characterized downstream branches in the literature. As more high‑coverage Y‑chromosome sequences and targeted SNP testing accumulate, additional downstream diversity may be resolved, revealing finer‑scale geographic or ethnolinguistic structure. Current evidence suggests that the clade is nested within the broader E‑M2 phylogeny and behaves similarly to other recent, population‑specific E1b1a branches.

Geographical Distribution

E1B1A1A1A1C1B is concentrated in West and Central Africa, where its parent clade and related E‑M2 subclades are common. Detectable frequencies are highest among West African groups (e.g., Yoruba, Akan) and Central African Bantu‑speaking populations (e.g., Kongo, Luba, Mbundu), with lower but notable presence among Southern African Bantu groups (e.g., Zulu, Xhosa) and in East African populations that received Bantu gene flow. Outside Africa, the haplogroup appears in African‑descended populations of the Americas and Caribbean as a consequence of the transatlantic slave trade; occasional low‑frequency occurrences in North Africa and southern Europe reflect historic contact and recent migration.

Historical and Cultural Significance

E1B1A1A1A1C1B is best understood in the context of Late Holocene demographic processes in sub‑Saharan Africa. Its emergence and spread are plausibly linked to:

  • Late Bantu expansions and regional demographic growth during the Iron Age, when local founder effects could amplify newly arisen lineages.
  • Iron Age social complexity (metallurgy, sedentism, trade networks) in West/Central Africa that facilitated population growth and local differentiation.
  • Historic events such as the transatlantic slave trade, which exported West and Central African paternal lineages to the Americas and Caribbean, where they persist today in African‑descended communities.

Because this is a recent and regionally concentrated clade, it can be informative for genealogical and population studies aiming to resolve within‑region relationships, micro‑differentiation among Bantu‑speaking groups, or tracing paternal lineages in the African diaspora.

Conclusion

E1B1A1A1A1C1B is a recent, regionally focused branch of the E‑M2 paternal family, reflecting Late Holocene population dynamics in West and Central Africa. Its current distribution highlights the interplay of localized demographic expansion, Bantu‑associated movements, and historic dispersals that shaped modern African and African‑derived paternal diversity. Ongoing sequencing and targeted SNP testing will refine its phylogeny and improve resolution of its geographic and ethnolinguistic associations.

Key Points

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Reference profile

Tree & Relationships

Phylogenetic context and subclades

Evolution Path

Follow the recorded parent branches toward E1B1A1A1A1C1B. Dates are estimates and can change as reference data is revised.

Steps Haplogroup Age Estimate Archaeology Era Time Passed Immediate Descendants Tested Modern Descendants Ancient Connections
1 E1B1A1A1A1C1B Current ~700 years ago Medieval 700 years 0 34 0
2 E1B1A1A1A1C1 ~1,000 years ago Medieval 1,200 years 2 238 0
3 E1B1A1A1A1C ~2,000 years ago Roman Period 1,800 years 3 265 1
4 E1B1A1A1A1 ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,500 years 2 271 0
5 E1B1A1A1A ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 years 2 414 0
6 E1B1A1A1 ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 5,500 years 1 425 0
7 E1B1A1A ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 years 1 425 0
8 E1B1A1 ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 years 1 433 0
9 E1B1A ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 years 1 437 0
10 E1B1 ~28,000 years ago Paleolithic 28,000 years 2 1,572 0
11 E1B ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 years 1 1,583 0
12 E1 ~50,000 years ago Paleolithic 50,000 years 2 1,667 2
13 E ~50,000 years ago Paleolithic 50,000 years 3 1,813 3

Subclades (0)

Terminal branch - no recorded subclades

Siblings (1)

Other branches from the same parent haplogroup

Reference profile

Where in the World

Geographic distribution and modern presence

Recorded origin

West/Central Africa

Modern Distribution

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup E1B1A1A1A1C1B is found include:

  1. Yoruba and other West African groups (e.g., Akan, Mande-speaking populations)
  2. Central African Bantu-speaking populations (e.g., Kongo, Luba, Mbundu)
  3. Southern African Bantu groups (e.g., Zulu, Xhosa, Tswana) at moderate frequencies
  4. Eastern African populations with Bantu ancestry (e.g., parts of Tanzania, Kenya, Great Lakes region)
  5. African-descended populations in the Americas and Caribbean (via the transatlantic slave trade)
  6. Low-frequency occurrences in North Africa and southern Europe due to historical contact and recent migration

Regional Presence

Central Africa Moderate
Southern Africa Moderate
Western Africa Low
Eastern Africa Low
Caribbean & Americas (diaspora) Low
West Africa High
Eastern Africa Low
Southern Europe Low
Historical context

A branch through time

Estimated formation in a broad historical timeline. Period markers provide context and do not imply a connection with particular cultures.

  1. ~10k years ago

    Neolithic Revolution

    Agriculture begins, settled communities form

  2. ~5k years ago

    Bronze Age

    Metalworking, writing, and early civilizations

  3. ~3k years ago

    Iron Age

    Iron tools, expanded trade networks

  4. ~2.5k years ago

    Classical Antiquity

    Greek and Roman civilizations flourish

  5. ~700 years ago

    Haplogroup E1B1A1A1A1C1B

    Estimated formation of this Y-DNA branch; dates and locations are reference estimates.

    This branch
  6. Present

    Present Day

    Modern era

Reference profile

Archaeological context

Recorded archaeological associations for Y-DNA branch E1B1A1A1A1C1B

Recorded associations

These labels describe archaeological contexts recorded for reference samples linked to E1B1A1A1A1C1B. An association does not establish that all carriers belonged to a culture or followed a particular migration route.

Afro-Mexican AL_ANDALUS Al-Andalus Iron Age Pastoral Modern Period Ngongo Mbata present
Culture assignments are based on archaeological context of ancient DNA samples and may represent regional associations during specific time periods.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Data

Data & Provenance

Source information and data quality

Last Updated 2026-06-15
Confidence Score 50/100
Coverage Low

Data Source

Classification, estimated dates and geographic context reflect the recorded reference data and may change as evidence is revised. Sample coverage is uneven; recorded locations and archaeological associations do not establish personal origin or cultural identity.