Skip to main content
Y-DNA · Paternal lineage

E1B1A1A1A2A1A3A1

Y-DNA Haplogroup E1B1A1A1A2A1A3A1

A reference profile for one lineage branch. Shared haplogroups do not establish a family relationship or cultural identity.

Reference profile

Branch background

Historical context for Y-DNA lineage branch E1B1A1A1A2A1A3A1

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup E1B1A1A1A2A1A3A1 sits as a terminal, very recent subclade beneath the broader E-M2 (E1b1a) branch that predominates across West and much of sub-Saharan Africa. Given its position in the phylogeny as a downstream branch of E1B1A1A1A2A1A3A, the most parsimonious inference is that E1B1A1A1A2A1A3A1 represents a recent split reflecting localized demographic events (expanded pedigrees or community-level lineages) rather than a deep prehistoric migration. Time-to-most-recent-common-ancestor (TMRCA) estimates for comparable terminal E-M2 subclades typically fall in the range of decades to a few centuries, consistent with this clade's position.

Subclades (if applicable)

As a very downstream and recently defined terminal clade, E1B1A1A1A2A1A3A1 itself may show further micro-branches at the genealogical level when high-resolution sequencing or large-scale testing reveals private SNPs, but currently it is treated as a terminal or near-terminal lineage. Substructure within this clade, if discovered, is most likely to reflect recent family-group splits or village-level differentiation rather than ancient population splits.

Geographical Distribution

Empirical observations and reasonable inference from the parent clade indicate that E1B1A1A1A2A1A3A1 is concentrated in West and Central African populations—especially among Bantu-speaking groups and neighboring West African communities. It is expected at variable frequencies among groups such as Yoruba, Akan, Igbo, Kongo, Luba, and other Bantu-speaking populations in Central, Southern, and parts of East Africa. The haplogroup also appears in the African diaspora in the Americas and the Caribbean as a consequence of historic forced migrations (trans-Atlantic slave trade) and is occasionally found at low frequency in North Africa and Southern Europe resulting from recent migration.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because the clade is so recent, its primary significance is for genetic genealogy, forensic, and recent population-structure studies rather than for reconstructing deep prehistoric events. Presence of this lineage in the Americas and Caribbean typically signals recent genealogical ancestry tracing back to West/Central Africa, often within the last 10 generations. Within Africa, its distribution aligns broadly with Bantu-speaking populations and the demographic processes that shaped modern West/Central African genetic diversity (local expansions, settlement patterns, and recent social structure).

Conclusion

E1B1A1A1A2A1A3A1 is best interpreted as a marker of recent, localized paternal ancestry within the broader, long-established E-M2 lineage. It is most useful for fine-scale genealogical inference and studies of recent demographic history among West/Central African populations and their descendants in the diaspora. Future high-resolution sequencing and larger regional sampling may reveal finer substructure and allow precise dating of branching events within this terminal clade.

Key Points

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Reference profile

Tree & Relationships

Phylogenetic context and subclades

Evolution Path

Follow the recorded parent branches toward E1B1A1A1A2A1A3A1. Dates are estimates and can change as reference data is revised.

Steps Haplogroup Age Estimate Archaeology Era Time Passed Immediate Descendants Tested Modern Descendants Ancient Connections
1 E1B1A1A1A2A1A3A1 Current ~50 years ago Modern <100 years 1 0 0
2 E1B1A1A1A2A1A3A ~50 years ago Modern <100 years 2 2 0
3 E1B1A1A1A2A1A3 ~100 years ago Modern 100 years 2 6 0
4 E1B1A1A1A2A1A ~200 years ago Modern 200 years 1 6 0
5 E1B1A1A1A2A1 ~500 years ago Modern 500 years 1 126 0
6 E1B1A1A1A2A ~800 years ago Medieval 800 years 1 135 0
7 E1B1A1A1A2 ~2,000 years ago Roman Period 2,000 years 1 135 0
8 E1B1A1A1A ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 years 2 414 0
9 E1B1A1A1 ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 5,500 years 1 425 0
10 E1B1A1A ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 years 1 425 0
11 E1B1A1 ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 years 1 433 0
12 E1B1A ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 years 1 437 0
13 E1B1 ~28,000 years ago Paleolithic 28,000 years 2 1,572 0
14 E1B ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 years 1 1,583 0
15 E1 ~50,000 years ago Paleolithic 50,000 years 2 1,667 2
16 E ~50,000 years ago Paleolithic 50,000 years 3 1,813 3

Siblings (1)

Other branches from the same parent haplogroup

Reference profile

Where in the World

Geographic distribution and modern presence

Recorded origin

West/Central Africa

Modern Distribution

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup E1B1A1A1A2A1A3A1 is found include:

  1. Yoruba and other West African groups (e.g., Akan, Igbo)
  2. Bantu-speaking populations in Central Africa (e.g., Kongo, Luba)
  3. Bantu-speaking populations in Southern Africa (e.g., Zulu, Xhosa) at variable frequency
  4. Bantu-speaking and neighboring groups in the Great Lakes/East Africa (low to moderate frequencies)
  5. Populations in parts of Cameroon, Gabon and Chad influenced by regional gene flow (variable)
  6. African-descended populations in the Americas and Caribbean (present via the trans-Atlantic slave trade)
  7. Low-frequency occurrences in parts of North Africa and Southern Europe tied to recent migration

Regional Presence

Western Africa High
Central Africa High
Southern Africa Moderate
Eastern Africa Low
North America (African diaspora) Moderate
South America (African diaspora) Moderate
Western Europe Low
West Africa High
Caribbean Moderate
North Africa Low
Southern Europe Low
Historical context

A branch through time

Estimated formation in a broad historical timeline. Period markers provide context and do not imply a connection with particular cultures.

  1. ~10k years ago

    Neolithic Revolution

    Agriculture begins, settled communities form

  2. ~5k years ago

    Bronze Age

    Metalworking, writing, and early civilizations

  3. ~3k years ago

    Iron Age

    Iron tools, expanded trade networks

  4. ~2.5k years ago

    Classical Antiquity

    Greek and Roman civilizations flourish

  5. ~50 years ago

    Haplogroup E1B1A1A1A2A1A3A1

    Estimated formation of this Y-DNA branch; dates and locations are reference estimates.

    This branch
  6. Present

    Present Day

    Modern era

Reference profile

Archaeological context

Recorded archaeological associations for Y-DNA branch E1B1A1A1A2A1A3A1

Recorded associations

These labels describe archaeological contexts recorded for reference samples linked to E1B1A1A1A2A1A3A1. An association does not establish that all carriers belonged to a culture or followed a particular migration route.

Afro-Mexican AL_ANDALUS Al-Andalus Bungule Faza Iron Age Pastoral Makwasinyi Modern Period present
Culture assignments are based on archaeological context of ancient DNA samples and may represent regional associations during specific time periods.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Data

Data & Provenance

Source information and data quality

Last Updated 2026-06-15
Confidence Score 50/100
Coverage Low

Data Source

Classification, estimated dates and geographic context reflect the recorded reference data and may change as evidence is revised. Sample coverage is uneven; recorded locations and archaeological associations do not establish personal origin or cultural identity.