Skip to main content
Y-DNA · Paternal lineage

E1B1B1A1A1B2

Y-DNA Haplogroup E1B1B1A1A1B2

A reference profile for one lineage branch. Shared haplogroups do not establish a family relationship or cultural identity.

Reference profile

Branch background

Historical context for Y-DNA lineage branch E1B1B1A1A1B2

Origins and Evolution

E1B1B1A1A1B2 is a downstream branch of the M78-derived E1b1b clade (often written in older literature under the E-M78 umbrella). Its parent clade (E1B1B1A1A1B) is inferred to have diversified in the eastern Mediterranean / Balkan corridor during the Bronze Age. E1B1B1A1A1B2 likely split from that parent lineage later — during the late Bronze Age to Iron Age / early historical periods — reflecting more localized demographic processes within southeastern Europe and adjacent coastal zones of Anatolia and the Levant. The time estimate of ~2.3 kya (approximately the first millennium BCE) is consistent with a subclade that expanded or differentiated during the Iron Age and Hellenistic periods, when increased mobility, trade and colonization affected the genetic landscape of the Mediterranean.

Subclades (if applicable)

As a downstream branch, E1B1B1A1A1B2 may itself contain further nested sublineages defined by additional SNPs (single-nucleotide polymorphisms) observable on high-resolution Y-tree builds and in targeted sequencing. At low sample sizes these downstream branches are often rare and regionally localized; future deep sequencing (whole Y-chromosome) and larger population screens are the main routes to resolve and name any internal subclades. In practice, E1B1B1A1A1B2 functions as a regional marker within the broader M78-derived radiation.

Geographical Distribution

This haplogroup shows a concentration in the Balkans and Aegean with detectable presence in adjacent regions of Anatolia, southern Italy, the Levant and parts of North Africa and Egypt at lower frequencies. The distribution pattern matches routes of maritime and coastal connectivity across the eastern Mediterranean and is consistent with historical episodes of population movement (e.g., Bronze Age trade networks, Greek colonization, Hellenistic and Roman-era mobility, and later medieval movements). Modern detections are usually at low to moderate frequency within local populations and may appear sporadically in the broader Mediterranean due to later migrations and diaspora.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Although not a high-frequency pan-Mediterranean lineage, E1B1B1A1A1B2 is useful for interpreting fine-scale regional histories. Its presence in the Balkans and Aegean aligns it with populations involved in Bronze Age and Iron Age connectivity (including Mycenaean and later Greek-speaking communities) and with coastal Anatolian and Levantine groups. The haplogroup's pattern of occurrence supports scenarios of localized differentiation after an earlier M78 dispersal from Northeast Africa / Near East into southeastern Europe and the Mediterranean coast. Co-occurrence with other Mediterranean Y-haplogroups (notably J2 lineages) and common European maternal lineages in autosomal and mtDNA profiles reflects the multi-layered demographic history of the region.

Conclusion

E1B1B1A1A1B2 is a regional, M78-derived Y-lineage that documents post-Bronze Age differentiation in the eastern Mediterranean and Balkans. It is most informative when used in combination with higher-resolution Y-chromosome sequencing, autosomal analyses, and archaeological context to trace local expansions, colonization events and historical migrations across the Aegean, Anatolia, southern Italy and the Levant.

Key Points

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Reference profile

Tree & Relationships

Phylogenetic context and subclades

Evolution Path

Follow the recorded parent branches toward E1B1B1A1A1B2. Dates are estimates and can change as reference data is revised.

Steps Haplogroup Age Estimate Archaeology Era Time Passed Immediate Descendants Tested Modern Descendants Ancient Connections
1 E1B1B1A1A1B2 Current ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,300 years 0 0 0
2 E1B1B1A1A1B ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,200 years 2 34 1
3 E1B1B1A1A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 years 2 51 0
4 E1B1B1A1A ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 years 2 77 0
5 E1B1B1A1 ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 years 2 456 0
6 E1B1B1A ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 years 2 457 0
7 E1B1B1 ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 years 2 1,055 0
8 E1B1B ~26,000 years ago Paleolithic 26,000 years 1 1,116 2
9 E1B1 ~28,000 years ago Paleolithic 28,000 years 2 1,572 0
10 E1B ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 years 1 1,583 0
11 E1 ~50,000 years ago Paleolithic 50,000 years 2 1,667 2
12 E ~50,000 years ago Paleolithic 50,000 years 3 1,813 3

Subclades (0)

Terminal branch - no recorded subclades

Siblings (1)

Other branches from the same parent haplogroup

Reference profile

Where in the World

Geographic distribution and modern presence

Recorded origin

Eastern Mediterranean / Balkans

Modern Distribution

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup E1B1B1A1A1B2 is found include:

  1. Balkan populations (e.g., Greeks, Albanians, Bulgarians, Serbs)
  2. Southern Italian populations and parts of the Italian Peninsula (Apulia, Calabria, Sicily)
  3. Anatolian and Aegean populations (western Turkey, Crete, Cyclades)
  4. Levantine populations (Lebanese, Palestinians, Syrians)
  5. Egyptian and Nile Delta groups (lower to moderate frequencies)
  6. North African coastal and Berber groups (low frequencies)
  7. Sporadic presence in Horn of Africa groups (low frequency)
  8. Diaspora populations in the Americas, Australia and elsewhere via historical migrations

Regional Presence

Southeastern Europe (Balkans) Moderate
Southern Europe (Italy, Sicily, Sardinia) Moderate
Western Asia / Near East (Anatolia, Levant) Low
North Africa (coastal) Low
North America (diaspora) Low
Horn of Africa / Nile Delta influence Low
Historical context

A branch through time

Estimated formation in a broad historical timeline. Period markers provide context and do not imply a connection with particular cultures.

  1. ~10k years ago

    Neolithic Revolution

    Agriculture begins, settled communities form

  2. ~5k years ago

    Bronze Age

    Metalworking, writing, and early civilizations

  3. ~3k years ago

    Iron Age

    Iron tools, expanded trade networks

  4. ~2.5k years ago

    Classical Antiquity

    Greek and Roman civilizations flourish

  5. ~2.3k years ago

    Haplogroup E1B1B1A1A1B2

    Estimated formation of this Y-DNA branch; dates and locations are reference estimates.

    This branch
  6. Present

    Present Day

    Modern era

Reference profile

Archaeological context

Recorded archaeological associations for Y-DNA branch E1B1B1A1A1B2

Recorded associations

These labels describe archaeological contexts recorded for reference samples linked to E1B1B1A1A1B2. An association does not establish that all carriers belonged to a culture or followed a particular migration route.

Iberomaurusian Nderit Culture Nubian Christian Pastoral Neolithic Roman Provincial Songo Mnara
Culture assignments are based on archaeological context of ancient DNA samples and may represent regional associations during specific time periods.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Data

Data & Provenance

Source information and data quality

Last Updated 2026-06-15
Confidence Score 50/100
Coverage Low

Data Source

Classification, estimated dates and geographic context reflect the recorded reference data and may change as evidence is revised. Sample coverage is uneven; recorded locations and archaeological associations do not establish personal origin or cultural identity.