Menu
Research Publication

The Demographic Development of the First Farmers in Anatolia

Kılınç GM, Omrak A, Özer F et al.

27498567 PubMed ID
27 Authors
10/10/2016 Published
18 Samples
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

KG
Kılınç GM
OA
Omrak A
ÖF
Özer F
GT
Günther T
BA
Büyükkarakaya AM
BE
Bıçakçı E
BD
Baird D
DH
Dönertaş HM
GA
Ghalichi A
YR
Yaka R
KD
Koptekin D
AS
Açan SC
PP
Parvizi P
KM
Krzewińska M
DE
Daskalaki EA
YE
Yüncü E
DN
Dağtaş ND
FA
Fairbairn A
PJ
Pearson J
MG
Mustafaoğlu G
EY
Erdal YS
ÇY
Çakan YG
Togan İ
SM
Somel M
SJ
Storå J
JM
Jakobsson M
GA
Götherström A
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

The archaeological documentation of the development of sedentary farming societies in Anatolia is not yet mirrored by a genetic understanding of the human populations involved, in contrast to the spread of farming in Europe [1-3]. Sedentary farming communities emerged in parts of the Fertile Crescent during the tenth millennium and early ninth millennium calibrated (cal) BC and had appeared in central Anatolia by 8300 cal BC [4]. Farming spread into west Anatolia by the early seventh millennium cal BC and quasi-synchronously into Europe, although the timing and process of this movement remain unclear. Using genome sequence data that we generated from nine central Anatolian Neolithic individuals, we studied the transition period from early Aceramic (Pre-Pottery) to the later Pottery Neolithic, when farming expanded west of the Fertile Crescent. We find that genetic diversity in the earliest farmers was conspicuously low, on a par with European foraging groups. With the advent of the Pottery Neolithic, genetic variation within societies reached levels later found in early European farmers. Our results confirm that the earliest Neolithic central Anatolians belonged to the same gene pool as the first Neolithic migrants spreading into Europe. Further, genetic affinities between later Anatolian farmers and fourth to third millennium BC Chalcolithic south Europeans suggest an additional wave of Anatolian migrants, after the initial Neolithic spread but before the Yamnaya-related migrations. We propose that the earliest farming societies demographically resembled foragers and that only after regional gene flow and rising heterogeneity did the farming population expansions into Europe occur.

Chapter III

Ancient DNA Samples

18 ancient DNA samples referenced in this publication

18 Samples
Sample ID Date/Era Country Locality Sex mtDNA Y-DNA
Bon001 8212 BCE Turkey Boncuklu M U3 G-PF3355
Bon002 8279 BCE Turkey Boncuklu F K1-a
Bon004 8300 BCE Turkey Boncuklu M N1a1a1 G-CTS8176
Bon005 8300 BCE Turkey Boncuklu F N1a1a1
Tep001 6645 BCE Turkey Tepecik Ciftlik M K1-a J-M304
Tep002 6636 BCE Turkey Tepecik Ciftlik F K1a12a
Tep003 6570 BCE Turkey Tepecik Ciftlik M N1b1a G-PF3146
Tep004 6385 BCE Turkey Tepecik Ciftlik F N1a1a1
Tep006 6223 BCE Turkey Tepecik Ciftlik M N1a1a1 C-V20
Tep006 6223 BCE Turkey Tepecik Ciftlik M N1a1a1
Tep001 6645 BCE Turkey Tepecik Ciftlik M K1-a
Tep003 6570 BCE Turkey Tepecik Ciftlik M N1b1a
Tep002 6636 BCE Turkey Tepecik Ciftlik F K1a12a
Tep004 6385 BCE Turkey Tepecik Ciftlik F N1a1a1
Bon002 8279 BCE Turkey Boncuklu F K1-a
Bon004 8300 BCE Turkey Boncuklu M N1a1a1
Bon001 8212 BCE Turkey Boncuklu M U3
Bon005 8300 BCE Turkey Boncuklu F N1a1a1
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of ancestry and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Summary

Key Findings

Ancestry Insights

Traits Analysis

Historical Context

Scientific Assessment