Menu
Research Publication

Ancient DNA HLA typing reveals significant shifts in frequency in Europe since the Neolithic.

Plascencia Alan Godínez, AG Jakobsson, Mattias M et al.

39979344 PubMed ID
4 Authors
2025-02-20 Published
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

PA
Plascencia Alan Godínez
AJ
AG Jakobsson
MM
Mattias M
SF
Sánchez-Quinto Federico
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Computational HLA typing has surged as a cost-effective strategy to uncover questions regarding the evolution of the HLA system, enabling immunogenic characterization from ancient DNA (aDNA) data. Nevertheless, it remains to be seen whether these methods are suitable for analyzing aDNA generated without target-enrichment. To investigate this, we evaluated the performance of five HLA typing tools using present-day data with simulated profiles typical of aDNA, as well as from high-coverage aDNA genomes downsampled at different read depths. We found that characterization of Class I genes at the first field resolution is feasible at read depths as low as 2x, where it retains an accuracy of ≈ 80%. Next, we used this insight to characterize HLA evolution in Europe from 154 ancient genomes by detecting allele frequency changes throughout distinct prehistoric European populations. We observed important shifts in alleles associated with infectious and autoimmune diseases, most of which are found by contrasting the HLA landscape of Neolithic Farmers to that of present-day. Interestingly, several of these observations are in line with findings that have been previously reported by target-enrichment-based studies. Our results highlight the feasibility of applying HLA typing on shotgun aDNA data to examine the evolution of this loci during important transitions.

Chapter III

Analysis

Comprehensive review of ancestry and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Summary

Key Findings

Ancestry Insights

Traits Analysis

Historical Context

Scientific Assessment