Menu
Research Publication

A catalogue of early diverged contemporary human genome variation reveals distinct Khoe-San populations.

Jaratlerdsiri Weerachai, W Soh, Pamela X Y PXY et al.

41667478 PubMed ID
23 Authors
2026-02-10 Published
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

JW
Jaratlerdsiri Weerachai
WS
W Soh
PX
Pamela X Y PXY
GT
Gong Tingting
TJ
T Jiang
JJ
Jue J
SZ
Simayi Zolani
ZP
Z Petersen
DC
Desiree C DC
HE
Holland Errol
EC
E Chan
EK
Eva K F EKF
TK
Theron Kathrine E
KH
KE Haacke
WH
Wilfrid H G WHG
FH
Förtsch Hagen E A
HB
HEA Bornman
MS
M S Riana MSR
TD
Thomas David M
DM
DM Mphahlele
JJ
Jeffrey J
HV
Hayes Vanessa M
V
VM
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Creating a catalogue of early diverged genome variation is critical to determine the true extent of human diversity and associated medical impact. Generating deep whole genome data for 150 Khoe-San (12 groups, 1 unclassified), and 40 regionally comparative Southern Africans (3 groups), we identify ~30 million small-to-large variants - over 1.3 million unknown single nucleotide variants. Representing shared traditionally forager lifestyles and click-speaking languages, we identify San and Damara as separate phylogenetic lineages, contributing two admixture waves to Nama. While San represented modern humans' deep divergence (~115 thousand years ago), Damara divergence is recent, with both showing high effective population sizes between 45-150 thousand years ago. Developing an assembly-based test we report 1,376 genes under positive selection (dN/dS = 19.46) of which 479 are significantly associated with forager peoples and, therefore, maintained ancestral alleles that differ from derived genetic variation observed in non-African biomedical resources.

Chapter III

Analysis

Comprehensive review of ancestry and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Summary

Key Findings

Ancestry Insights

Traits Analysis

Historical Context

Scientific Assessment