Menu
Research Publication

Settlement strategies and their driving mechanisms of Neolithic settlements using machine learning approaches: a case study in Zhejiang Province

Xiaoxuan Fan, Longjiang Mao, Chunhui Zou et al.

5 Authors
2025-05-19 Published
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

XF
Xiaoxuan Fan
LM
Longjiang Mao
CZ
Chunhui Zou
CW
Chenyu Wang
DM
Duowen Mo
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Deciphering Neolithic settlement environmental selection strategies is vital for understanding prehistoric human-environment relationships. This study employs a multi-classification XGBoost model and SHAP analysis to accurately classify 432 Neolithic archaeological sites in Zhejiang Province (AUC = 0.93), effectively distinguishing environmental selection patterns across different cultural phases. The model’s feature importance ranking indicates that elevation, surface relief, slope, and water buffer zones are main factors influencing settlement site selection, though their impact intensity and mechanisms vary significantly across different cultural phases. Early Neolithic settlements (11.0–7.0 ka BP) favored high-altitude, vegetated river valleys supporting hunting-gathering economies, while mid-Neolithic communities (7.0–4.3 ka BP) shifted to lowland alluvial plains promoting rice agriculture. Late Neolithic settlements (4.3 ka BP-) expanded to higher elevations to mitigate flooding risks, coinciding with revived hunting-gathering practices. This study highlights the interplay between environmental and socio-economic factors in shaping settlement patterns and demonstrates the value of machine learning for archaeological research.

Chapter III

Analysis

Comprehensive review of ancestry and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Summary

Key Findings

Ancestry Insights

Traits Analysis

Historical Context

Scientific Assessment