Menu
GWAS Study

Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Set-Based Association Tests.

Lin WY, Huang CC, Liu YL et al.

30693016 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
16543 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

LW
Lin WY
HC
Huang CC
LY
Liu YL
TS
Tsai SJ
KP
Kuo PH
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

The identification of gene-environment interactions (G × E) may eventually guide health-related choices and medical interventions for complex diseases. More powerful methods must be developed to identify G × E. The "adaptive combination of Bayes factors method" (ADABF) has been proposed as a powerful genome-wide polygenic approach to detect G × E. In this work, we evaluate its performance when serving as a gene-based G × E test. We compare ADABF with six tests including the "Set-Based gene-EnviRonment InterAction test" (SBERIA), "gene-environment set association test" (GESAT), etc. With extensive simulations, SBERIA and ADABF are found to be more powerful than other G × E tests. However, SBERIA suffers from a power loss when 50% SNP main effects are in the same direction with the SNP × E interaction effects while 50% are in the opposite direction. We further applied these seven G × E methods to the Taiwan Biobank data to explore gene× alcohol interactions on blood pressure levels. The ADAMTS7P1 gene at chromosome 15q25.2 was detected to interact with alcohol consumption on diastolic blood pressure (p = 9.5 × 10-7, according to the GESAT test). At this gene, the P-values provided by other six tests all reached the suggestive significance level (p < 5 × 10-5). Regarding the computation time required for a genome-wide G × E analysis, SBERIA is the fastest method, followed by ADABF. Considering the validity, power performance, robustness, and computation time, ADABF is recommended for genome-wide G × E analyses.

1,764 Han Chinese and unknown ancestry alcohol drinkers, 14,779 Han Chinese and unknown ancestry non-drinkers

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

16543
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
East Asian, NR
Ancestry
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.