Menu
GWAS Study

Detecting Gene-Environment Interaction for Maternal Exposures Using Case-Parent Trios Ascertained Through a Case With Non-Syndromic Orofacial Cleft.

Zhang W, Venkataraghavan S, Hetmanski JB et al.

33937227 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
8925 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

ZW
Zhang W
VS
Venkataraghavan S
HJ
Hetmanski JB
LE
Leslie EJ
MM
Marazita ML
FE
Feingold E
WS
Weinberg SM
RI
Ruczinski I
TM
Taub MA
SA
Scott AF
RD
Ray D
BT
Beaty TH
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Two large studies of case-parent trios ascertained through a proband with a non-syndromic orofacial cleft (OFC, which includes cleft lip and palate, cleft lip alone, or cleft palate alone) were used to test for possible gene-environment (G × E) interaction between genome-wide markers (both observed and imputed) and self-reported maternal exposure to smoking, alcohol consumption, and multivitamin supplementation during pregnancy. The parent studies were as follows: GENEVA, which included 1,939 case-parent trios recruited largely through treatment centers in Europe, the United States, and Asia, and 1,443 case-parent trios from the Pittsburgh Orofacial Cleft Study (POFC) also ascertained through a proband with an OFC including three major racial/ethnic groups (European, Asian, and Latin American). Exposure rates to these environmental risk factors (maternal smoking, alcohol consumption, and multivitamin supplementation) varied across studies and among racial/ethnic groups, creating substantial differences in power to detect G × E interaction, but the trio design should minimize spurious results due to population stratification. The GENEVA and POFC studies were analyzed separately, and a meta-analysis was conducted across both studies to test for G × E interaction using the 2 df test of gene and G × E interaction and the 1 df test for G × E interaction alone. The 2 df test confirmed effects for several recognized risk genes, suggesting modest G × E effects. This analysis did reveal suggestive evidence for G × Vitamin interaction for CASP9 on 1p36 located about 3 Mb from PAX7, a recognized risk gene. Several regions gave suggestive evidence of G × E interaction in the 1 df test. For example, for G × Smoking interaction, the 1 df test suggested markers in MUSK on 9q31.3 from meta-analysis. Markers near SLCO3A1 also showed suggestive evidence in the 1 df test for G × Alcohol interaction, and rs41117 near RETREG1 (a.k.a. FAM134B) also gave suggestive significance in the meta-analysis of the 1 df test for G × Vitamin interaction. While it remains quite difficult to obtain definitive evidence for G × E interaction in genome-wide studies, perhaps due to small effect sizes of individual genes combined with low exposure rates, this analysis of two large case-parent trio studies argues for considering possible G × E interaction in any comprehensive study of complex and heterogeneous disorders such as OFC.

321 European ancestry exposed trios, 875 European ancestry unexposed trios, 42 Asian ancestry exposed trios, 1,224 Asian ancestry unexposed trios, 79 Latin American exposed trios, 434 Latin American unexposed trios

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

8925
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European, Asian unspecified, Hispanic or Latin American
Ancestry
Norway, China, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, U.S.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.