Menu
GWAS Study

Polygenic risk modeling for prediction of epithelial ovarian cancer risk.

Dareng EO, Tyrer JP, Barnes DR et al.

35027648 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
63702 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

DE
Dareng EO
TJ
Tyrer JP
BD
Barnes DR
JM
Jones MR
YX
Yang X
AK
Aben KKH
AM
Adank MA
AS
Agata S
AI
Andrulis IL
AH
Anton-Culver H
AN
Antonenkova NN
AG
Aravantinos G
AB
Arun BK
AA
Augustinsson A
BJ
Balmaña J
BE
Bandera EV
BR
Barkardottir RB
BD
Barrowdale D
BM
Beckmann MW
BA
Beeghly-Fadiel A
BJ
Benitez J
BM
Bermisheva M
BM
Bernardini MQ
BL
Bjorge L
BA
Black A
BN
Bogdanova NV
BB
Bonanni B
BA
Borg A
BJ
Brenton JD
BA
Budzilowska A
BR
Butzow R
BS
Buys SS
CH
Cai H
CM
Caligo MA
CI
Campbell I
CR
Cannioto R
CH
Cassingham H
CJ
Chang-Claude J
CS
Chanock SJ
CK
Chen K
CY
Chiew YE
CW
Chung WK
CK
Claes KBM
CS
Colonna S
CL
Cook LS
CF
Couch FJ
DM
Daly MB
DF
Dao F
DE
Davies E
DL
de la Hoya M
DP
de Putter R
DJ
Dennis J
DA
DePersia A
DP
Devilee P
DO
Diez O
DY
Ding YC
DJ
Doherty JA
DS
Domchek SM
DT
Dörk T
DB
du Bois A
DM
Dürst M
ED
Eccles DM
EH
Eliassen HA
EC
Engel C
EG
Evans GD
FP
Fasching PA
FJ
Flanagan JM
FR
Fortner RT
ME
Machackova E
FE
Friedman E
GP
Ganz PA
GJ
Garber J
GF
Gensini F
GG
Giles GG
GG
Glendon G
GA
Godwin AK
GM
Goodman MT
GM
Greene MH
GJ
Gronwald J
HE
Hahnen E
HC
Haiman CA
HN
Håkansson N
HU
Hamann U
HT
Hansen TVO
HH
Harris HR
HM
Hartman M
HF
Heitz F
HM
Hildebrandt MAT
HE
Høgdall E
HC
Høgdall CK
HJ
Hopper JL
HR
Huang RY
HC
Huff C
HP
Hulick PJ
HD
Huntsman DG
IE
Imyanitov EN
IC
Isaacs C
JA
Jakubowska A
JP
James PA
JR
Janavicius R
JA
Jensen A
JO
Johannsson OT
JE
John EM
JM
Jones ME
KD
Kang D
KB
Karlan BY
KA
Karnezis A
KL
Kelemen LE
KE
Khusnutdinova E
KL
Kiemeney LA
KB
Kim BG
KS
Kjaer SK
KI
Komenaka I
KJ
Kupryjanczyk J
KA
Kurian AW
KA
Kwong A
LD
Lambrechts D
LM
Larson MC
LC
Lazaro C
LN
Le ND
LG
Leslie G
LJ
Lester J
LF
Lesueur F
LD
Levine DA
LL
Li L
LJ
Li J
LJ
Loud JT
LK
Lu KH
LJ
Lubiński J
MP
Mai PL
MS
Manoukian S
MJ
Marks JR
MR
Matsuno RK
MK
Matsuo K
MT
May T
ML
McGuffog L
MJ
McLaughlin JR
MI
McNeish IA
MN
Mebirouk N
MU
Menon U
MA
Miller A
MR
Milne RL
MA
Minlikeeva A
MF
Modugno F
MM
Montagna M
MK
Moysich KB
ME
Munro E
NK
Nathanson KL
NS
Neuhausen SL
NH
Nevanlinna H
YJ
Yie JNY
NH
Nielsen HR
NF
Nielsen FC
NL
Nikitina-Zake L
OK
Odunsi K
OK
Offit K
OE
Olah E
OS
Olbrecht S
OO
Olopade OI
OS
Olson SH
OH
Olsson H
OA
Osorio A
PL
Papi L
PS
Park SK
PM
Parsons MT
PH
Pathak H
PI
Pedersen IS
PA
Peixoto A
PT
Pejovic T
PP
Perez-Segura P
PJ
Permuth JB
PB
Peshkin B
PP
Peterlongo P
PA
Piskorz A
PD
Prokofyeva D
RP
Radice P
RJ
Rantala J
RM
Riggan MJ
RH
Risch HA
RC
Rodriguez-Antona C
RE
Ross E
RM
Rossing MA
RI
Runnebaum I
SD
Sandler DP
SM
Santamariña M
SP
Soucy P
SR
Schmutzler RK
SV
Setiawan VW
SK
Shan K
SW
Sieh W
SJ
Simard J
SC
Singer CF
SA
Sokolenko AP
SH
Song H
SM
Southey MC
SH
Steed H
SD
Stoppa-Lyonnet D
SR
Sutphen R
SA
Swerdlow AJ
TY
Tan YY
TM
Teixeira MR
TS
Teo SH
TK
Terry KL
TM
Terry MB
TM
Thomassen M
TP
Thompson PJ
TL
Thomsen LCV
TD
Thull DL
TM
Tischkowitz M
TL
Titus L
TA
Toland AE
TD
Torres D
TB
Trabert B
TR
Travis R
TN
Tung N
TS
Tworoger SS
VE
Valen E
VA
van Altena AM
VD
van der Hout AH
VN
Van Nieuwenhuysen E
VR
van Rensburg EJ
VA
Vega A
ED
Edwards DV
VR
Vierkant RA
WF
Wang F
WB
Wappenschmidt B
WP
Webb PM
WC
Weinberg CR
WJ
Weitzel JN
WN
Wentzensen N
WE
White E
WA
Whittemore AS
WS
Winham SJ
WA
Wolk A
WY
Woo YL
WA
Wu AH
YL
Yan L
YD
Yannoukakos D
ZK
Zavaglia KM
ZW
Zheng W
ZA
Ziogas A
ZK
Zorn KK
KZ
Kleibl Z
ED
Easton D
LK
Lawrenson K
DA
DeFazio A
ST
Sellers TA
RS
Ramus SJ
PC
Pearce CL
MA
Monteiro AN
CJ
Cunningham J
GE
Goode EL
SJ
Schildkraut JM
BA
Berchuck A
CG
Chenevix-Trench G
GS
Gayther SA
AA
Antoniou AC
PP
Pharoah PDP
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have the potential to improve risk stratification. Joint estimation of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) effects in models could improve predictive performance over standard approaches of PRS construction. Here, we implemented computationally efficient, penalized, logistic regression models (lasso, elastic net, stepwise) to individual level genotype data and a Bayesian framework with continuous shrinkage, "select and shrink for summary statistics" (S4), to summary level data for epithelial non-mucinous ovarian cancer risk prediction. We developed the models in a dataset consisting of 23,564 non-mucinous EOC cases and 40,138 controls participating in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) and validated the best models in three populations of different ancestries: prospective data from 198,101 women of European ancestries; 7,669 women of East Asian ancestries; 1,072 women of African ancestries, and in 18,915 BRCA1 and 12,337 BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers of European ancestries. In the external validation data, the model with the strongest association for non-mucinous EOC risk derived from the OCAC model development data was the S4 model (27,240 SNPs) with odds ratios (OR) of 1.38 (95% CI: 1.28-1.48, AUC: 0.588) per unit standard deviation, in women of European ancestries; 1.14 (95% CI: 1.08-1.19, AUC: 0.538) in women of East Asian ancestries; 1.38 (95% CI: 1.21-1.58, AUC: 0.593) in women of African ancestries; hazard ratios of 1.36 (95% CI: 1.29-1.43, AUC: 0.592) in BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers and 1.49 (95% CI: 1.35-1.64, AUC: 0.624) in BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. Incorporation of the S4 PRS in risk prediction models for ovarian cancer may have clinical utility in ovarian cancer prevention programs.

23,564 European ancestry female cases, 40,138 European ancestry female controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

63702
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
Russian Federation, Belarus, Spain, Greece, Canada, Netherlands, Sweden, U.S., Belgium, Norway, Finland, Poland, Denmark, U.K., Australia, Germany
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.