Menu
Currency
GWAS Study

Visual masking deficits in schizophrenia: a view into the genetics of the disease through an endophenotype.

Shaqiri A, Hodel F, da Cruz JR et al.

36585402 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
458 Participants
61 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

SA
Shaqiri A
HF
Hodel F
DC
da Cruz JR
RM
Roinishvili M
CE
Chkonia E
BA
Brand A
FJ
Fellay J
HM
Herzog MH
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Schizophrenia is a severe psychiatric disorder determined by a complex mixture of genetic and environmental factors. To better understand the contributions of human genetic variations to schizophrenia, we performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of a highly sensitive endophenotype. In this visual masking endophenotype, two vertical bars, slightly shifted in the horizontal direction, are briefly presented (vernier offset). Participants are asked to indicate the offset direction of the bars (either left or right). The bars are followed by a grating mask, which makes the task both spatially and temporally challenging. The inter-stimulus interval (ISI) between the vernier and the mask was determined in 206 patients with schizophrenia, 109 first-order relatives, and 143 controls. Usually, in GWAS studies, patients are compared to controls (i.e., a binary task) without considering the large differences in performance between patients and controls, as it occurs in many paradigms. The masking task allows for a particularly powerful analysis because the differences in ISI within the patient population are large. We genotyped all participants and searched for associations between human polymorphisms and the masking endophenotype using a linear mixed model. We did not identify any genome-wide significant associations (p < 5 × 10-8), indicating that common variants with strong effects are unlikely to contribute to the large inter-group differences in visual masking. However, we found significant differences in polygenetic risk scores (PRS) between patients and controls, and relatives and controls.

458 Georgian ancestry individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

458
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
Georgia
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

AI-Generated Summary

AI-generated by DNAGENICS

Independent AI summary of health and genetic findings from the published study

Important: This summary is AI-generated by DNAGENICS for informational purposes only. It was not created by, affiliated with, or endorsed by the researchers behind the original publication, and is based solely on that published research. It may contain errors or omissions. DNAGENICS disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies or consequences arising from use of this information. Verify all information against the original publication. This is not professional scientific review or medical advice.

AI Summary In Progress

Our AI-generated summary of this publication is being prepared. Please check back soon.