Menu
GWAS Study

Assessing the predictive efficacy of European-based systolic blood pressure polygenic risk scores in diverse Brazilian cohorts.

Teixeira SK, Rossi FPN, Patane JL et al.

39548300 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
286581 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

TS
Teixeira SK
RF
Rossi FPN
PJ
Patane JL
NJ
Neyra JM
JA
Jensen AVV
HB
Horta BL
PA
Pereira AC
KJ
Krieger JE
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Despite the identification of numerous genetic variants affecting SBP in European populations, their applicability in admixed populations remains unclear. This study evaluates the predictive efficacy of a systolic blood pressure (SBP) polygenic risk score (PRS), derived from the UK Biobank data, in two Brazilian cohorts. We analyzed 944 K genetic variants consistent across an independent UK Biobank dataset, Brazilian cohorts, and HapMap database. Results show a significant association between increased PRS and SBP, as well as hypertension, in each study groups analyzed. An increase of one standard deviation in the PRS showed a significant association with SBP (β [95% CI] (mmHg) = 5.2 [5.1-5.3], 2.8 [2.1-3.5] and 2.6 [2.2-3.0]) and hypertension (odds ratio (OR) [95% CI] = 1.56 [1.54-1.56], 1.28 [1.2-1.4] and 1.47 [1.3-1.6]) in an independent UKB dataset, Baependi, and Pelotas, respectively. The associations were weaker in the Brazilian samples and the reduced association was noticeable in the Pelotas vs. the UK comparison for hypertension stages 1 and 2 (OR [95% CI] = 2.1 [1.5-3.1] and 3.0 [1.9-4.7] vs. 2.5 [2.2-2.8] and 4.9 [4.4-5.6]), whereas the Baependi data showed no significance for stage 1 hypertension. This trend mirrors findings in homogeneous African and Asian populations with diverse genetic architecture, highlighting the limitations of European-based PRS also in admixed populations. These insights are crucial for developing tailored disease prevention and management strategies in ethnically diverse groups.

286,581 European ancestry individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

286581
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
U.K.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.