Skip to main content
mtDNA · Maternal lineage

Y1A1

mtDNA Haplogroup Y1A1

A reference profile for one lineage branch. Shared haplogroups do not establish a family relationship or cultural identity.

Reference profile

Branch background

Historical context for mtDNA lineage branch Y1A1

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup Y1A1 is a downstream branch of Y1A, itself a rare lineage within macro-haplogroup Y that is concentrated in the northwestern Pacific Rim. Based on its phylogenetic position and the estimated time depth of its parent clade, Y1A1 most likely arose in Northeast Asia during the mid-Holocene (several thousand years after the Last Glacial Maximum). Its internal diversity is low, consistent with a relatively recent local diversification from Y1A and/or a population history marked by founder effects and restricted maternal population sizes in coastal and riverine groups.

Because Y1A and its subclades are uncommon and geographically restricted, Y1A1 is particularly useful as a marker for tracking postglacial coastal dispersals, island/coastal hunter-gatherer continuity, and interactions between populations around the Sea of Okhotsk and northern Japan.

Subclades

Y1A1 is a terminal or near-terminal branch within the Y1A structure in currently published phylogenies. Where multiple internal branches exist they show low sequence diversity, reflecting either a recent branching event or undersampling of small source populations. Future dense mitogenome sampling in northeastern Eurasia (Hokkaido, Sakhalin, Kamchatka and the Amur region) could reveal additional substructure within Y1A1 and clarify relationships to nearby Y1A subclades.

Geographical Distribution

The modern distribution of Y1A1 is strongly concentrated in Northeast Asian coastal and riverine groups. Highest relative frequencies are reported in small, geographically concentrated populations (for example, some Ainu and indigenous groups of the Russian Far East), with low to sporadic occurrences in mainland Japan, Korea and scattered low-frequency reports farther afield (Southeast Asia and rare trans‑Beringian detections in the Americas). The pattern—localized peaks plus scattered low-frequency occurrences—matches expectations for a lineage that expanded within a restricted coastal/ecological niche and occasionally moved with small-scale migrations or long-distance contacts.

Ancient DNA evidence for Y1A-lineages (including lineages close to Y1A1) has been recovered from a small number of archaeological contexts in northern Japan and the Russian Far East, consistent with continuity or recurrent presence of this maternal lineage among Jomon, Okhotsk, and later coastal cultures.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because of its concentration among populations traditionally associated with the northern Japanese and Okhotsk cultural spheres, Y1A1 contributes to genetic signals interpreted as Jomon-related and Okhotsk-related ancestry in modern groups such as the Ainu and certain indigenous Siberian peoples (Nivkh, Ulchi-area groups). Its rarity and locality make it valuable for distinguishing local continuity from later, broad-scale migrations (for example, differentiating coastal hunter-gatherer contributions from agricultural expansions across East Asia).

Y1A1 is not a marker of large continent-spanning demographic events; instead it documents regional maternal continuity, founder effects, and coastal mobility in the northwestern Pacific during the Holocene.

Conclusion

Y1A1 is a geographically informative, low-frequency maternal lineage that likely arose in Northeast Asia in the mid-Holocene and is concentrated among coastal/riparian populations of Hokkaido, Sakhalin and the Russian Far East. Its limited diversity and patchy modern distribution reflect both recent origin and demographic processes (founder effects, small effective population sizes, and localized continuity). Continued mitogenome sequencing in northeastern Eurasia and expanded ancient DNA sampling will refine its internal topology and clarify its role in late Holocene population history of the northwestern Pacific.

Key Points

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Reference profile

Tree & Relationships

Phylogenetic context and subclades

Evolution Path

Follow the recorded parent branches toward Y1A1. Dates are estimates and can change as reference data is revised.

Steps Haplogroup Age Estimate Archaeology Era Time Passed Immediate Descendants Tested Modern Descendants Ancient Connections
1 Y1A1 Current ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 years 0 0 0
2 Y1A ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,000 years 1 3 6
3 Y1 ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 years 2 7 1
4 Y ~11,000 years ago Neolithic 11,000 years 2 26 0
5 N9 ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 years 3 178 0
6 N ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 years 16 26,150 13
7 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 years 7 30,162 6
8 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
9 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
10 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
11 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
12 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
13 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 years 2 32,236 5

Subclades (0)

Terminal branch - no recorded subclades

Reference profile

Where in the World

Geographic distribution and modern presence

Recorded origin

Northeast Asia / Far East Siberia

Modern Distribution

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup Y1A1 is found include:

  1. Ainu and some northern Japanese populations (Hokkaido)
  2. Indigenous groups of the Russian Far East and Sakhalin (e.g., Nivkh, Ulchi-area groups)
  3. Siberian populations along the Amur, Kamchatka and adjacent regions (occasional reports among Even, Evenk and related groups)
  4. Mainland Japanese and Korean samples at low frequencies
  5. Scattered low-frequency occurrences in some Southeast Asian populations
  6. Very rare occurrences in North American samples consistent with trans‑Beringian connections
Historical context

A branch through time

Estimated formation in a broad historical timeline. Period markers provide context and do not imply a connection with particular cultures.

  1. ~10k years ago

    Neolithic Revolution

    Agriculture begins, settled communities form

  2. ~5k years ago

    Bronze Age

    Metalworking, writing, and early civilizations

  3. ~4k years ago

    Haplogroup Y1A1

    Estimated formation of this mtDNA branch; dates and locations are reference estimates.

    This branch
  4. ~3k years ago

    Iron Age

    Iron tools, expanded trade networks

  5. ~2.5k years ago

    Classical Antiquity

    Greek and Roman civilizations flourish

  6. Present

    Present Day

    Modern era

Reference profile

Archaeological context

Recorded archaeological associations for mtDNA branch Y1A1

Recorded associations

These labels describe archaeological contexts recorded for reference samples linked to Y1A1. An association does not establish that all carriers belonged to a culture or followed a particular migration route.

Early Avar Gongguan Late Medieval Mongolian Mongol Tasmola
Culture assignments are based on archaeological context of ancient DNA samples and may represent regional associations during specific time periods.
Reference profile

Sample Catalog

6 direct carriers of haplogroup Y1A1

6 shown · 6 matching samples

Portraits are AI-generated illustrations. Sample labels and accession IDs identify the reference records.

Portrait Sample Country Era Date Culture mtDNA Match
AI-generated illustrative portrait of Early Avar-o High East Asia individual, Csongrád-Csanád County. Apátfalva-Nagyútdűlő, Hungary (630-660 CE)
Sample ID: AN-376
Hungary Hungary EarlyAvar 600-700 CE Early Avar Y1a1 Direct
AI-generated illustrative portrait of Early Avar-o High East Asia individual, Danube-Tisza Interfluve. Kecskemét-Sallai út, Hungary (630-670 CE)
Sample ID: A1823
Hungary Early Avar Period Danube-Tisza, Hungary 600-700 CE Early Avar Y1a1 Direct
AI-generated illustrative portrait of Early Avar individual, Csongrád-Csanád County. Szeged-FehértóA, Hungary (650-675 CE)
Sample ID: SZF-371
Hungary Hungary EarlyAvar 650-700 CE Early Avar Y1a1 Direct
AI-generated illustrative portrait of EIA Tasmola individual, Birlik (Almaty) (Almaty Region, Talgar District), Kazakhstan (776-481 BCE)
Sample ID: BIR013
Kazakhstan Tasmola Culture 800-450 BCE Tasmola Y1a1 Direct
AI-generated illustrative portrait of Khentii Late Medieval individual, Tavan Khailaast, Mongolia (1,299-1,409 CE)
Sample ID: TK5-8
Mongolia Mongol Empire 1299-1409 calCE (IAAA-130276) Mongol Y1a1 Direct
AI-generated illustrative portrait of Khentii Late Medieval individual, Tavan Khailaast, Mongolia (1,330-1,442 CE)
Sample ID: TK5-2
Mongolia Mongol Empire 1330-1442 calCE (IAAA-150902) Mongol Y1a1 Direct
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Reference profile

Carrier Distribution Map

Geographic distribution of 6 ancient DNA samples (direct and subclade carriers of Y1A1)

Direct carrier
Time Period Filter
All Time Periods
Showing all samples
Reference profile

Temporal Distribution

Distribution of carriers across archaeological periods

Reference profile

Geographic Distribution

Counts by recorded sample country. These reflect the available reference selection, not population frequencies.

Reference profile

Country × Era Distribution

Compare recorded sample counts across countries and archaeological periods. Select a populated cell to inspect a sample.

Data

Data & Provenance

Source information and data quality

Last Updated 2026-02-16
Confidence Score 50/100
Coverage Low

Data Source

Classification, estimated dates and geographic context reflect the recorded reference data and may change as evidence is revised. Sample coverage is uneven; recorded locations and archaeological associations do not establish personal origin or cultural identity.