Menu
Y-DNA Haplogroup • Paternal Lineage

C2A1A1B1A

Y-DNA Haplogroup C2A1A1B1A

~1,000 years ago
Northeast Asia / Southern Siberia
1 subclades
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

The Story

The journey of Y-DNA haplogroup C2A1A1B1A

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup C2A1A1B1A is a terminal subclade nested beneath C2A1A1B1, itself a branch of the broader C2-M217 haplogroup that dominates many populations of northern and eastern Eurasia. Given the phylogenetic position downstream of C2A1A1B1 and the parent haplogroup's proposed emergence on the forest–steppe margin of Northeast Asia / southern Siberia around the late Bronze–Iron Age, C2A1A1B1A most plausibly formed later, during the first millennium CE to the early medieval period (on the order of ~1.0–1.5 kya). Its formation likely reflects local differentiation within populations practicing mobile pastoralism, hunting, and mixed subsistence strategies on the inner Eurasian steppe and adjacent forest areas.

Subclades

As a relatively terminal and specific branch of C2A1A1B1, C2A1A1B1A may contain further minor sublineages defined by private SNPs in high-resolution sequencing datasets. Published population surveys and ancient DNA studies have so far identified only a limited number of instances assigned to this precise downstream label, so the internal structure of C2A1A1B1A is presently shallow in public trees. Continued whole Y-chromosome sequencing in Mongolic, Tungusic, and neighboring groups may reveal additional downstream branches and estimate more precise coalescence times.

Geographical Distribution

C2A1A1B1A is concentrated in Northeast Asia / southern Siberia and shows its highest frequencies among Mongolic-speaking groups (for example Khalkha Mongols and some Buryat groups) and several Tungusic peoples (Evenks, Evens, and related communities). It occurs at lower frequencies in adjacent Turkic-speaking populations of Central Asia (certain Kazakh and Kyrgyz subpopulations) and at low frequency in northern Han Chinese and Korean samples. The haplogroup has been reported in a small number of medieval and Iron Age archaeological contexts from Mongolia and southern Siberia, consistent with a history of regional continuity and medieval-era expansions.

Historical and Cultural Significance

The regional distribution and time depth of C2A1A1B1A align it with demographic processes on the eastern Eurasian steppe during the first millennium BCE through the second millennium CE. While the parent clade formed earlier on the forest–steppe margin, downstream subclades such as C2A1A1B1A may reflect population differentiation and localized lineage expansions tied to historically attested nomadic confederations and later medieval polities. The haplogroup is therefore relevant to studies of Mongolic and Tungusic population history, including the demographic impacts of the Mongol Empire (13th century CE) and other steppe polities that mediated gene flow across Mongolia, Siberia, and portions of Central and Northeast Asia.

Conclusion

C2A1A1B1A represents a geographically focused, relatively recent branch of the C2-M217 family that highlights the genetic continuity and regional differentiation of patrilineages on the Northeast Asian forest–steppe. It is most informative when combined with high-resolution Y-chromosome sequencing and ancient DNA evidence to reconstruct migration, social structure, and the timing of male-line expansions among Mongolic and Tungusic-speaking populations.

Key Points

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Chapter II

Tree & Relationships

Phylogenetic context and subclades

Evolution Path

This haplogroup's evolutionary journey from its earliest ancestor to the present.

Steps Haplogroup Age Estimate Archaeology Era Time Passed Immediate Descendants Tested Modern Descendants Ancient Connections
1 C2A1A1B1A Current ~1,000 years ago 🏰 Medieval 1,200 years 1 0 0

Siblings (1)

Other branches from the same parent haplogroup

Chapter III

Where in the World

Geographic distribution and modern presence

Place of Origin

Northeast Asia / Southern Siberia

Modern Distribution

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup C2A1A1B1A is found include:

  1. Mongolic-speaking groups (e.g., Khalkha Mongols, Buryats)
  2. Tungusic peoples (e.g., Evenks, Evens, some Manchu-related groups)
  3. Central Asian Turkic groups at low-to-moderate frequency (e.g., some Kazakh and Kyrgyz subpopulations)
  4. Northern Han Chinese and Korean populations at low frequency
  5. Ancient and medieval archaeological individuals from Mongolia and southern Siberia

Regional Presence

Northeast Asia / Southern Siberia High
Central Asia Moderate
East Asia (northern China, Korea) Low
CHAPTER IV

When in Time

Your haplogroup in the context of human history

~10k years ago

Neolithic Revolution

Agriculture begins, settled communities form

~5k years ago

Bronze Age

Metalworking, writing, and early civilizations

~3k years ago

Iron Age

Iron tools, expanded trade networks

~2k years ago

Classical Antiquity

Greek and Roman civilizations flourish

~1k years ago

Haplogroup C2A1A1B1A

Your Y-DNA haplogroup emerged in Northeast Asia / Southern Siberia

Northeast Asia / Southern Siberia
Present

Present Day

Modern era

Your Haplogroup
Historical Era
Chapter IV-B

Linked Cultures

Ancient cultures associated with Y-DNA haplogroup C2A1A1B1A

Cultural Heritage

These ancient cultures have been linked to haplogroup C2A1A1B1A based on matching ancient DNA samples from archaeological excavations. The presence of this haplogroup in these cultures provides insights into the migrations and population movements of populations carrying this haplogroup.

Afanasievo Culture Avar Boisman Khovd Long-Term Late Medieval Mongolian Mongolian Neolithic Northern Mongolian Culture Sukhbaatar Culture Ulgii Culture Uvs Multi-Period Xiongnu Culture
Culture assignments are based on archaeological context of ancient DNA samples and may represent regional associations during specific time periods.
Data

Data & Provenance

Source information and data quality

Last Updated 2026-02-16
Confidence Score 50/100
Coverage Low
Data Source

We use the latest phylotree for YDNA haplogroup classification and data.