Menu
Y-DNA Haplogroup • Paternal Lineage

C2B1A1B1

Y-DNA Haplogroup C2B1A1B1

~2,000 years ago
Northeast Asia / Siberia
0 subclades
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

The Story

The journey of Y-DNA haplogroup C2B1A1B1

Origins and Evolution

Y‑DNA haplogroup C2B1A1B1 is a sublineage of C2B1A1B, itself nested within the broader C2 (C‑M217) phylogeny that is characteristic of northeastern Eurasian male lineages. Based on its position downstream of C2B1A1B and the population associations of closely related subclades, the most parsimonious estimate places the origin of C2B1A1B1 within the last ~1,000–2,000 years (approximately 1.5 kya, i.e., mid–late first millennium CE). This time depth is consistent with late Iron Age to early historic demographic processes in Siberia and adjacent parts of East‑Central Asia that produced localized founder events.

Subclades

As a relatively deep but recent branch of C2B1A1B, C2B1A1B1 may contain further internal structure identifiable with high‑resolution SNP or STR analysis; however, published phylogenies and population screens indicate that many records of C2B1A1B1 represent a small number of high‑frequency clan‑level lineages rather than a broad, deeply split clade. Where sampling density is sufficient, sublineages often correspond to geographically or ethnically restricted founder clusters (for example, lineages concentrated within particular Mongolic or Tungusic groups).

Geographical Distribution

The present distribution of C2B1A1B1 is concentrated in Northeast Asia and Siberia, with highest frequencies observed among certain Mongolic‑ and Tungusic‑speaking populations and among Yakut (Sakha) males in northeastern Siberia. Smaller, low‑frequency occurrences are reported in neighboring East Asian minority groups and in parts of Central Asia, reflecting historical gene flow and mobility across the Eurasian steppe. Ancient DNA evidence for this exact subclade is limited but present (five aDNA samples in the referenced database), supporting a historical presence in archaeological contexts across the region.

Historical and Cultural Significance

The timing and geography of C2B1A1B1 suggest associations with mobile pastoralist and hunter‑herder societies of the late Iron Age through the medieval period in Siberia and Mongolia. Such lineages can be amplified by patrilineal clan structures and founder effects arising from social systems that favor the reproductive success of particular male lineages (a pattern documented for several C2 subclades in Eurasia). Although broad public narratives sometimes link C2 subclades with pan‑Eurasian expansions (for example, those associated with the Mongol Empire), smaller downstream branches like C2B1A1B1 often reflect regional expansions and clan‑level demographic events rather than empire‑wide introductions alone.

Genetically, C2B1A1B1 typically coexists in populations with other northern Eurasian Y lineages (for example, N1c) and with East Eurasian mtDNA lineages (such as mtDNA C and D), indicating complex male and female mediated gene flow over centuries.

Conclusion

C2B1A1B1 is a regionally important, relatively recent branch of the C2 (M217) family that captures aspects of northeastern Eurasian demographic history in the last two millennia: localized founder effects, association with Mongolic and Tungusic groups and Yakut populations, and persistence into the historic and modern periods. Continued dense sampling, high‑coverage sequencing, and ancient DNA recovery will refine its internal structure and timing, but current evidence frames it as a hallmark of northeastern Eurasian male ancestry tied to pastoralist and hunter‑herder social dynamics.

Key Points

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Chapter II

Tree & Relationships

Phylogenetic context and subclades

Evolution Path

This haplogroup's evolutionary journey from its earliest ancestor to the present.

Steps Haplogroup Age Estimate Archaeology Era Time Passed Immediate Descendants Tested Modern Descendants Ancient Connections
1 C2B1A1B1 Current ~2,000 years ago 🏰 Medieval 1,500 years 0 3 0

Subclades (0)

Terminal branch - no known subclades

Chapter III

Where in the World

Geographic distribution and modern presence

Place of Origin

Northeast Asia / Siberia

Modern Distribution

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup C2B1A1B1 is found include:

  1. Mongolic-speaking populations (e.g., Mongols, Buryats)
  2. Tungusic-speaking groups (e.g., Evenks, Evens, Orochs and related peoples)
  3. Yakut (Sakha) and other Yakutian-associated populations in northeastern Siberia
  4. Indigenous Siberian hunter-gatherer and reindeer‑herding communities
  5. Scattered individuals in Central Asian populations (low frequency)
  6. Occasional individuals in neighboring East Asian minority groups (low frequency)

Regional Presence

Northeast Asia / Siberia High
East Asia (border regions) Low
Central Asia (scattered) Low
CHAPTER IV

When in Time

Your haplogroup in the context of human history

~10k years ago

Neolithic Revolution

Agriculture begins, settled communities form

~5k years ago

Bronze Age

Metalworking, writing, and early civilizations

~3k years ago

Iron Age

Iron tools, expanded trade networks

~2k years ago

Classical Antiquity

Greek and Roman civilizations flourish

~1k years ago

Haplogroup C2B1A1B1

Your Y-DNA haplogroup emerged in Northeast Asia / Siberia

Northeast Asia / Siberia
Present

Present Day

Modern era

Your Haplogroup
Historical Era
Chapter IV-B

Linked Cultures

Ancient cultures associated with Y-DNA haplogroup C2B1A1B1

Cultural Heritage

These ancient cultures have been linked to haplogroup C2B1A1B1 based on matching ancient DNA samples from archaeological excavations. The presence of this haplogroup in these cultures provides insights into the migrations and population movements of populations carrying this haplogroup.

Afanasievo Culture Blagoveshchensk Culture Chinese Iron Age Chinese Paleolithic Early Medieval Mongolian Irkutsk Culture Lena River Culture Ming Dynasty Siberian Paleolithic Sila Culture West Liao River Culture Xianbei Culture
Culture assignments are based on archaeological context of ancient DNA samples and may represent regional associations during specific time periods.
Chapter V

Sample Catalog

5 direct carriers and 1 subclade carrier of haplogroup C2B1A1B1

6 / 6 samples
Portrait Sample Country Era Date Culture Y-DNA Match
Portrait of ancient individual MGS-M6 from China, dated 50 CE - 250 CE
MGS-M6
China Iron Age Xianbei Culture, Amur River Region, China 50 CE - 250 CE Xianbei Culture C2b1a1b1 Direct
Portrait of ancient individual MGS-M7L from China, dated 50 CE - 250 CE
MGS-M7L
China Iron Age Xianbei Culture, Amur River Region, China 50 CE - 250 CE Xianbei Culture C2b1a1b1 Direct
Portrait of ancient individual ZLNR-1 from China, dated 81 CE - 236 CE
ZLNR-1
China Iron Age China 81 CE - 236 CE Chinese Iron Age C2b1a1b1 Direct
Portrait of ancient individual bla001 from Russia, dated 601 CE - 758 CE
bla001
Russia Iron Age Blagoveshchensk, Russia 601 CE - 758 CE Blagoveshchensk Culture C2b1a1b1 Direct
Portrait of ancient individual 91KLM2 from China, dated 1050 BCE - 350 BCE
91KLM2
China Bronze Age West Liao River, China 1050 BCE - 350 BCE West Liao River Culture C2b1a1b1 Direct
Portrait of ancient individual MGS-M7R from China, dated 50 CE - 250 CE
MGS-M7R
China Iron Age Xianbei Culture, Amur River Region, China 50 CE - 250 CE Xianbei Culture C2b1a1b1b Downstream
Chapter VI

Carrier Distribution Map

Geographic distribution of 6 ancient DNA samples (direct and subclade carriers of C2B1A1B1)

Direct carrier Subclade carrier
Time Period Filter
All Time Periods
Showing all samples
Chapter VII

Temporal Distribution

Distribution of carriers across archaeological periods

Chapter VIII

Geographic Distribution

Distribution by country of origin (direct and subclade carriers shown by default)

Chapter IX

Country × Era Distribution

Cross-tabulation of carrier countries and archaeological periods (direct and subclade carriers shown by default)

Data

Data & Provenance

Source information and data quality

Last Updated 2026-02-16
Confidence Score 50/100
Coverage Low
Data Source

We use the latest phylotree for YDNA haplogroup classification and data.