Skip to main content
Y-DNA · Paternal lineage

E1B1B1B2A1A4

Y-DNA Haplogroup E1B1B1B2A1A4

A reference profile for one lineage branch. Shared haplogroups do not establish a family relationship or cultural identity.

Reference profile

Branch background

Historical context for Y-DNA lineage branch E1B1B1B2A1A4

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup E1B1B1B2A1A4 is a recent, geographically concentrated subclade nested within the broader E‑M81 (E1b1b1b2a) family. Based on the phylogenetic position underneath E1B1B1B2A1A and patterns seen in comparable E‑M81 downstream branches, E1B1B1B2A1A4 most likely arose in the Northwest African (Maghreb) region within the last one to two thousand years. Its emergence reflects a local founder event or series of closely spaced founder events that produced a distinctive regional lineage in Amazigh (Berber) and insular populations.

Mutational accumulation and the tight clustering of derived markers relative to the parent clade indicate a shallow time depth and a history dominated by drift and demographic expansions in localized communities rather than broad continent‑wide dispersals.

Subclades

As a terminally described (or relatively downstream) subclade, E1B1B1B2A1A4 may itself contain micro‑sublineages detectable only with high‑resolution sequencing or targeted SNP testing. In many E‑M81 branches, further subdivisions reflect island founder events, extended patrilineal pedigrees, or localized clan expansions; the same pattern is expected for E1B1B1B2A1A4 where present.

Future full Y‑chromosome sequencing of individuals carrying this marker may reveal additional downstream SNPs that clarify fine‑scale relationships between Amazigh enclaves, Guanche (pre‑Hispanic Canary Island) remains, and coastal North African groups.

Geographical Distribution

The distribution of E1B1B1B2A1A4 is strongly centered on Northwest Africa (the Maghreb) with highest frequencies in specific Amazigh populations and in island populations that experienced founder effects (notably the Canary Islands). Outside the Maghreb it appears at lower but non‑negligible frequencies in southern Iberia (western Andalusia and parts of Portugal), some central/western Mediterranean islands (e.g., Sicily at low frequency), and in coastal North African urban populations. Small percentages are detected farther afield through historical migration and admixture: limited presence in parts of the Sahel and West Africa (likely via regional contact), scattered occurrences in eastern Mediterranean and Near Eastern populations, and diaspora presence in the Americas and Caribbean following transatlantic movements.

The overall pattern is consistent with a Maghreb origin followed by local expansions and episodic maritime gene flow across the western Mediterranean.

Historical and Cultural Significance

E1B1B1B2A1A4 is closely associated with Amazigh (Berber) demes and island populations formed by pre‑Hispanic Guanche inhabitants of the Canary Islands and their descendants. Its demographic signal is typical of clan‑level founder events and insular drift: one or a few male founders leave a disproportionate genetic legacy. Historically, the western Mediterranean has seen repeated movement of peoples — coastal trade, Phoenician and Carthaginian contacts, Islamic expansions, trans‑Saharan interactions, and later European colonization — all of which can explain low‑level transmission beyond Northwest Africa.

Because its time depth is relatively recent, E1B1B1B2A1A4 is less likely to correspond to Paleolithic or early Neolithic expansions and more likely reflects regional historical processes in the first millennium CE and later, including settlement patterns, clan structure, and island colonization.

Conclusion

E1B1B1B2A1A4 represents a shallow, Maghreb‑centered branch of the E‑M81 family with pronounced founder effects in Amazigh and certain island populations. Its distribution highlights the role of localized demographic events and maritime contacts in shaping paternal lineages across the western Mediterranean. Targeted high‑resolution Y sequencing and broader sampling of North African and Canary Island populations will improve resolution of its internal structure and historical timing.

Key Points

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Reference profile

Tree & Relationships

Phylogenetic context and subclades

Evolution Path

Follow the recorded parent branches toward E1B1B1B2A1A4. Dates are estimates and can change as reference data is revised.

Steps Haplogroup Age Estimate Archaeology Era Time Passed Immediate Descendants Tested Modern Descendants Ancient Connections
1 E1B1B1B2A1A4 Current ~1,000 years ago Medieval 1,000 years 0 0 0
2 E1B1B1B2A1A ~1,000 years ago Medieval 1,200 years 4 118 1
3 E1B1B1B2A1 ~2,000 years ago Roman Period 1,800 years 1 134 0
4 E1B1B1B2A ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,200 years 1 143 2
5 E1B1B1B2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 years 2 177 0
6 E1B1B1B ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 years 2 405 0
7 E1B1B1 ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 years 2 1,055 0
8 E1B1B ~26,000 years ago Paleolithic 26,000 years 1 1,116 2
9 E1B1 ~28,000 years ago Paleolithic 28,000 years 2 1,572 0
10 E1B ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 years 1 1,583 0
11 E1 ~50,000 years ago Paleolithic 50,000 years 2 1,667 2
12 E ~50,000 years ago Paleolithic 50,000 years 3 1,813 3

Subclades (0)

Terminal branch - no recorded subclades

Siblings (3)

Other branches from the same parent haplogroup

Reference profile

Where in the World

Geographic distribution and modern presence

Recorded origin

Northwest Africa (Maghreb)

Modern Distribution

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup E1B1B1B2A1A4 is found include:

  1. Amazigh (Berber) populations of Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia
  2. Canary Islanders (pre‑Hispanic Guanche descendants and modern island populations)
  3. Coastal North African groups (Moroccans, Algerians, Tunisians, some Libyans)
  4. Southern Iberian populations (western Andalusia, Portugal)
  5. Parts of Sicily and other central/western Mediterranean islands at low frequencies
  6. Sahelian and West African groups at low frequencies (regional admixture)
  7. Small numbers in Near Eastern and eastern Mediterranean populations (historical gene flow)
  8. African‑descended populations in the Americas and Caribbean (diaspora presence and admixture)
  9. Isolated communities showing strong founder effects (local Amazigh enclaves and island populations)

Regional Presence

Northern Africa (Maghreb) High
Southern Europe (Iberian Peninsula) Moderate
Western Africa (Saharan edge / Atlantic coast) Low
Macaronesia (Canary Islands) Moderate
Western Asia / Near East Low
Northwest Africa (Maghreb) High
Mediterranean Islands Moderate
Southwestern Europe (Iberia) Low
Americas (diaspora) Low
Historical context

A branch through time

Estimated formation in a broad historical timeline. Period markers provide context and do not imply a connection with particular cultures.

  1. ~10k years ago

    Neolithic Revolution

    Agriculture begins, settled communities form

  2. ~5k years ago

    Bronze Age

    Metalworking, writing, and early civilizations

  3. ~3k years ago

    Iron Age

    Iron tools, expanded trade networks

  4. ~2.5k years ago

    Classical Antiquity

    Greek and Roman civilizations flourish

  5. ~1k years ago

    Haplogroup E1B1B1B2A1A4

    Estimated formation of this Y-DNA branch; dates and locations are reference estimates.

    This branch
  6. Present

    Present Day

    Modern era

Reference profile

Archaeological context

Recorded archaeological associations for Y-DNA branch E1B1B1B2A1A4

Recorded associations

These labels describe archaeological contexts recorded for reference samples linked to E1B1B1B2A1A4. An association does not establish that all carriers belonged to a culture or followed a particular migration route.

Austria_Avar Baja PPNB Canaanite Early Bronze Anatolia Early Iron Age Armenian Early Medieval Sardinian Gonur Culture Late Bronze Age Armenian Middle Bronze Age Armenian Roopkund Culture Topogaro Culture Viking
Culture assignments are based on archaeological context of ancient DNA samples and may represent regional associations during specific time periods.
Reference profile

Sample Catalog

1 direct carrier of haplogroup E1B1B1B2A1A4

1 shown · 1 matching samples

Portraits are AI-generated illustrations. Sample labels and accession IDs identify the reference records.

Portrait Sample Country Era Date Culture Y-DNA Match
AI-generated illustrative portrait of Norse individual, Gotland. Kopparsvik, Sweden (900-1,050 CE)
Sample ID: VK474
Sweden Sweden Viking 900 CE - 1050 CE Viking E1b1b1b2a1a4 Direct
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Reference profile

Carrier Distribution Map

Geographic distribution of 1 ancient DNA sample (direct and subclade carriers of E1B1B1B2A1A4)

Direct carrier
Time Period Filter
All Time Periods
Showing all samples
Reference profile

Temporal Distribution

Distribution of carriers across archaeological periods

Reference profile

Geographic Distribution

Counts by recorded sample country. These reflect the available reference selection, not population frequencies.

Reference profile

Country × Era Distribution

Compare recorded sample counts across countries and archaeological periods. Select a populated cell to inspect a sample.

Data

Data & Provenance

Source information and data quality

Last Updated 2026-06-16
Confidence Score 50/100
Coverage Low

Data Source

Classification, estimated dates and geographic context reflect the recorded reference data and may change as evidence is revised. Sample coverage is uneven; recorded locations and archaeological associations do not establish personal origin or cultural identity.