Skip to main content
Y-DNA · Paternal lineage

E1B1B1B2B2A1A

Y-DNA Haplogroup E1B1B1B2B2A1A

A reference profile for one lineage branch. Shared haplogroups do not establish a family relationship or cultural identity.

Reference profile

Branch background

Historical context for Y-DNA lineage branch E1B1B1B2B2A1A

Origins and Evolution

Haplogroup E1B1B1B2B2A1A sits as a very recent downstream branch of the E‑M81 (also written E1b1b1b2b2 / M183) paternal lineage that is widely recognized as a characteristic North‑West African (Maghreb) marker. Based on its phylogenetic position and the shallow STR/SNP diversity typically observed in comparable E‑M81 subclades, E1B1B1B2B2A1A most plausibly arose within the last several hundred years (on the order of 0.2–0.6 kya), reflecting a recent founder event or series of closely spaced mutations within local populations.

The lineage should be interpreted in the context of E‑M81’s broader history: E‑M81 shows a deep association with Amazigh (Berber) populations and produces many geographically restricted subclades with low internal diversity, consistent with repeated founder effects, isolation and localized expansions. E1B1B1B2B2A1A behaves like one of those terminal, geographically restricted branches.

Subclades

At present E1B1B1B2B2A1A appears as a terminal/near‑terminal subclade in public phylogenies and targeted studies of Maghreb and Canary Island lineages. Where present, further internal structure often shows very short branch lengths and private SNPs or STR signatures reflecting recent local diversification and founder effects. Additional deep sequencing and targeted SNP discovery in Maghrebi and island populations could reveal further substructure (private SNPs defining island or village‑level lineages).

Geographical Distribution

The distribution of E1B1B1B2B2A1A mirrors the pattern seen for several recent E‑M81 derivatives: high local frequency in isolated Amazigh communities and insular founder populations (notably the Canary Islands' Guanche-derived lineages); detectable but lower frequencies along the North African Atlantic and Mediterranean coasts; presence in southern Iberia (western Andalusia and Portugal) and parts of Sicily at reduced frequency due to historic Mediterranean contacts; and sporadic occurrences in West African and Near Eastern groups through regional gene flow. Historical trans‑Mediterranean movements and recent diaspora migrations are responsible for low‑frequency detections in the Americas and other regions.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because E1B1B1B2B2A1A is a recent, localized branch of E‑M81, its cultural significance is primarily tied to regional identity and founder events. In the Canary Islands the lineage—when present—often reflects legacy male ancestry from pre‑European Guanche populations or post‑contact island founder effects. In the Maghreb, its association with Amazigh groups underlines the pattern of localized paternal continuity in some Berber communities. Low‑level presence in southern Iberia and Sicily is most plausibly explained by medieval and later maritime contacts across the Western Mediterranean (including the period of Al‑Andalus and subsequent Atlantic exchanges).

From a practical perspective, E1B1B1B2B2A1A is useful in forensic, genealogical and population studies for identifying recent Maghrebi or island founder ancestry, but its recent origin and low diversity mean that high‑resolution SNP testing and careful genealogical correlation are required to avoid overinterpretation.

Conclusion

E1B1B1B2B2A1A exemplifies a pattern common to the E‑M81 family: rapid, recent differentiation producing geographically restricted terminal clades driven by founder effects and localized continuity. It points to recent male‑line demographic events in the Maghreb and associated island communities (notably the Canaries), with spillover into neighboring regions through historic contact and modern migration. Future targeted sequencing across North‑West Africa and Atlantic islands will refine its internal topology and more precisely date its origin and expansions.

Key Points

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Reference profile

Tree & Relationships

Phylogenetic context and subclades

Evolution Path

Follow the recorded parent branches toward E1B1B1B2B2A1A. Dates are estimates and can change as reference data is revised.

Steps Haplogroup Age Estimate Archaeology Era Time Passed Immediate Descendants Tested Modern Descendants Ancient Connections
1 E1B1B1B2B2A1A Current ~400 years ago Modern 400 years 1 0 0
2 E1B1B1B2B2A1 ~600 years ago Medieval 600 years 1 0 0
3 E1B1B1B2B2A ~800 years ago Medieval 800 years 1 0 5
4 E1B1B1B2B2 ~2,000 years ago Roman Period 2,000 years 1 0 0
5 E1B1B1B2B ~2,000 years ago Roman Period 2,000 years 1 30 8
6 E1B1B1B2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 years 2 177 0
7 E1B1B1B ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 years 2 405 0
8 E1B1B1 ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 years 2 1,055 0
9 E1B1B ~26,000 years ago Paleolithic 26,000 years 1 1,116 2
10 E1B1 ~28,000 years ago Paleolithic 28,000 years 2 1,572 0
11 E1B ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 years 1 1,583 0
12 E1 ~50,000 years ago Paleolithic 50,000 years 2 1,667 2
13 E ~50,000 years ago Paleolithic 50,000 years 3 1,813 3
Reference profile

Where in the World

Geographic distribution and modern presence

Recorded origin

Northwest Africa (Maghreb)

Modern Distribution

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup E1B1B1B2B2A1A is found include:

  1. Amazigh (Berber) populations of Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia
  2. Canary Islanders (ancient Guanche descendants and modern island populations)
  3. Coastal North African groups (Moroccans, Algerians, Tunisians)
  4. Southern Iberian populations (western Andalusia, Portugal) and parts of Sicily
  5. Sahelian and West African groups at low frequencies (regional admixture)
  6. Small numbers in Near Eastern and eastern Mediterranean populations (historical contact)
  7. African‑descended populations in the Americas and Caribbean (diaspora presence)
  8. Isolated communities showing founder effects (local Amazigh enclaves and island settlements)

Regional Presence

North Africa (Maghreb) High
Western Sahara & Mauritania (Saharan edge) Moderate
Southern Iberia (Spain & Portugal) Low
Canary Islands & nearby Atlantic areas Moderate
North Africa (Maghreb) High
Southern Europe (Iberia, Sicily) Low
The Americas (diaspora) Low
Historical context

A branch through time

Estimated formation in a broad historical timeline. Period markers provide context and do not imply a connection with particular cultures.

  1. ~10k years ago

    Neolithic Revolution

    Agriculture begins, settled communities form

  2. ~5k years ago

    Bronze Age

    Metalworking, writing, and early civilizations

  3. ~3k years ago

    Iron Age

    Iron tools, expanded trade networks

  4. ~2.5k years ago

    Classical Antiquity

    Greek and Roman civilizations flourish

  5. ~400 years ago

    Haplogroup E1B1B1B2B2A1A

    Estimated formation of this Y-DNA branch; dates and locations are reference estimates.

    This branch
  6. Present

    Present Day

    Modern era

Reference profile

Archaeological context

Recorded archaeological associations for Y-DNA branch E1B1B1B2B2A1A

Recorded associations

These labels describe archaeological contexts recorded for reference samples linked to E1B1B1B2B2A1A. An association does not establish that all carriers belonged to a culture or followed a particular migration route.

Elmenteitan Culture Historic Era 2 Late Swahili Pastoral Neolithic Songo Mnara Tanzania Multi-Period Tanzanian Prehistoric
Culture assignments are based on archaeological context of ancient DNA samples and may represent regional associations during specific time periods.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Data

Data & Provenance

Source information and data quality

Last Updated 2026-06-16
Confidence Score 50/100
Coverage Low

Data Source

Classification, estimated dates and geographic context reflect the recorded reference data and may change as evidence is revised. Sample coverage is uneven; recorded locations and archaeological associations do not establish personal origin or cultural identity.