Menu
GWAS Study

Multivariate genome-wide analyses of the well-being spectrum.

Baselmans BML, Jansen R, Ip HF et al.

30643256 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
80852 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

BB
Baselmans BML
JR
Jansen R
IH
Ip HF
VD
van Dongen J
AA
Abdellaoui A
VD
van de Weijer MP
BY
Bao Y
SM
Smart M
KM
Kumari M
WG
Willemsen G
HJ
Hottenga JJ
BD
Boomsma DI
DG
de Geus EJC
NM
Nivard MG
BM
Bartels M
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

We introduce two novel methods for multivariate genome-wide-association meta-analysis (GWAMA) of related traits that correct for sample overlap. A broad range of simulation scenarios supports the added value of our multivariate methods relative to univariate GWAMA. We applied the novel methods to life satisfaction, positive affect, neuroticism, and depressive symptoms, collectively referred to as the well-being spectrum (Nobs = 2,370,390), and found 304 significant independent signals. Our multivariate approaches resulted in a 26% increase in the number of independent signals relative to the four univariate GWAMAs and in an ~57% increase in the predictive power of polygenic risk scores. Supporting transcriptome- and methylome-wide analyses (TWAS and MWAS, respectively) uncovered an additional 17 and 75 independent loci, respectively. Bioinformatic analyses, based on gene expression in brain tissues and cells, showed that genes differentially expressed in the subiculum and GABAergic interneurons are enriched in their effect on the well-being spectrum.

80,852 European ancestry individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

80852
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
Yes
Replicated
59,206 European ancestry individuals
Replication Participants
European
Ancestry
U.K.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.