Menu
GWAS Study

Alternate approach to stroke phenotyping identifies a genetic risk locus for small vessel stroke.

von Berg J, van der Laan SW, McArdle PF et al.

32047268 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
31634 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

VB
von Berg J
VD
van der Laan SW
MP
McArdle PF
MR
Malik R
KS
Kittner SJ
MB
Mitchell BD
WB
Worrall BB
DR
de Ridder J
PS
Pulit SL
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Ischemic stroke (IS), caused by obstruction of cerebral blood flow, is one of the leading causes of death. While neurologists agree on delineation of IS into three subtypes (cardioembolic stroke (CES), large artery stroke (LAS), and small vessel stroke (SVS)), several subtyping systems exist. The most commonly used systems are TOAST (Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) and CCS (Causative Classification System for Stroke), but agreement is only moderate. We have compared two approaches to combining the existing subtyping systems for a phenotype suited for a genome-wide association study (GWAS). We used the NINDS Stroke Genetics Network dataset (SiGN, 11,477 cases with CCS and TOAST subtypes and 28,026 controls). We defined two new phenotypes: the intersect, for which an individual must be assigned the same subtype by CCS and TOAST; and the union, for which an individual must be assigned a subtype by either CCS or TOAST. The union yields the largest sample size while the intersect yields a phenotype with less potential misclassification. We performed GWAS for all subtypes, using the original subtyping systems, the intersect, and the union as phenotypes. In each subtype, heritability was higher for the intersect compared with the other phenotypes. We observed stronger effects at known IS variants with the intersect compared with the other phenotypes. With the intersect, we identify rs10029218:G>A as an associated variant with SVS. We conclude that this approach increases the likelihood to detect genetic associations in ischemic stroke.

3,608 European and African ancestry cases, 28,026 European and unknown ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

31634
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
African unspecified, European, NR, European
Ancestry
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.