Menu
GWAS Study

Genome-wide and transcriptome-wide association studies of mammographic density phenotypes reveal novel loci.

Chen H, Fan S, Stone J et al.

35414113 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
24579 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

CH
Chen H
FS
Fan S
SJ
Stone J
TD
Thompson DJ
DJ
Douglas J
LS
Li S
SC
Scott C
BM
Bolla MK
WQ
Wang Q
DJ
Dennis J
MK
Michailidou K
LC
Li C
PU
Peters U
HJ
Hopper JL
SM
Southey MC
NT
Nguyen-Dumont T
NT
Nguyen TL
FP
Fasching PA
BA
Behrens A
CG
Cadby G
MR
Murphy RA
AK
Aronson K
HA
Howell A
AS
Astley S
CF
Couch F
OJ
Olson J
MR
Milne RL
GG
Giles GG
HC
Haiman CA
MG
Maskarinec G
WS
Winham S
JE
John EM
KA
Kurian A
EH
Eliassen H
AI
Andrulis I
ED
Evans DG
NW
Newman WG
HP
Hall P
CK
Czene K
SA
Swerdlow A
JM
Jones M
PM
Pollan M
FP
Fernandez-Navarro P
MD
McConnell DS
KV
Kristensen VN
RJ
Rothstein JH
WP
Wang P
HL
Habel LA
SW
Sieh W
DA
Dunning AM
PP
Pharoah PDP
ED
Easton DF
GG
Gierach GL
TR
Tamimi RM
VC
Vachon CM
LS
Lindström S
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Mammographic density (MD) phenotypes, including percent density (PMD), area of dense tissue (DA), and area of non-dense tissue (NDA), are associated with breast cancer risk. Twin studies suggest that MD phenotypes are highly heritable. However, only a small proportion of their variance is explained by identified genetic variants.

24,579 European ancestry females

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

24579
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
Canada, Sweden, U.S., Norway, Poland, U.K., Australia, Germany, Spain
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.