Menu
GWAS Study

Longitudinal fundus imaging and its genome-wide association analysis provide evidence for a human retinal aging clock.

Ahadi S, Wilson KA, Babenko B et al.

36975205 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
45444 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

AS
Ahadi S
WK
Wilson KA
BB
Babenko B
MC
McLean CY
BD
Bryant D
PO
Pritchard O
KA
Kumar A
CE
Carrera EM
LR
Lamy R
SJ
Stewart JM
VA
Varadarajan A
BM
Berndl M
KP
Kapahi P
BA
Bashir A
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Biological age, distinct from an individual's chronological age, has been studied extensively through predictive aging clocks. However, these clocks have limited accuracy in short time-scales. Here we trained deep learning models on fundus images from the EyePACS dataset to predict individuals' chronological age. Our retinal aging clocking, 'eyeAge', predicted chronological age more accurately than other aging clocks (mean absolute error of 2.86 and 3.30 years on quality-filtered data from EyePACS and UK Biobank, respectively). Additionally, eyeAge was independent of blood marker-based measures of biological age, maintaining an all-cause mortality hazard ratio of 1.026 even when adjusted for phenotypic age. The individual-specific nature of eyeAge was reinforced via multiple GWAS hits in the UK Biobank cohort. The top GWAS locus was further validated via knockdown of the fly homolog, Alk, which slowed age-related decline in vision in flies. This study demonstrates the potential utility of a retinal aging clock for studying aging and age-related diseases and quantitatively measuring aging on very short time-scales, opening avenues for quick and actionable evaluation of gero-protective therapeutics.

45,444 European ancestry individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

45444
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
U.K.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.