Menu
GWAS Study

A signature of platelet reactivity in CBC scattergrams reveals genetic predictors of thrombotic disease risk.

Verdier H, Thomas P, Batista J et al.

37647652 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
29806 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

VH
Verdier H
TP
Thomas P
BJ
Batista J
KC
Kempster C
MH
McKinney H
GN
Gleadall N
DJ
Danesh J
MA
Mumford A
HJ
Heemskerk JWM
OW
Ouwehand WH
DK
Downes K
AW
Astle WJ
TE
Turro E
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Genetic studies of platelet reactivity (PR) phenotypes may identify novel antiplatelet drug targets. However, such studies have been limited by small sample sizes (n < 5000) because of the complexity of measuring PR. We trained a model to predict PR from complete blood count (CBC) scattergrams. A genome-wide association study of this phenotype in 29 806 blood donors identified 21 distinct associations implicating 20 genes, of which 6 have been identified previously. The effect size estimates were significantly correlated with estimates from a study of flow cytometry-measured PR and a study of a phenotype of in vitro thrombus formation. A genetic score of PR built from the 21 variants was associated with the incidence rates of myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism. Mendelian randomization analyses showed that PR was causally associated with the risks of coronary artery disease, stroke, and venous thromboembolism. Our approach provides a blueprint for using phenotype imputation to study the determinants of hard-to-measure but biologically important hematological traits.

29,806 British ancestry individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

29806
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
U.K.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.