Menu
Currency
Research Publication

Leveraging known Pacific colonisation times to test models for the ancestry of Southeast Asians.

Mafalda Almeida, Francesca Gandini, Teresa Rito et al.

41131077 PubMed ID
19 Authors
2025-10-23 Published
127 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

MA
Mafalda Almeida
FG
Francesca Gandini
TR
Teresa Rito
MG
M George Foody
AB
Andreia Brandão
MO
Marisa Oliveira
AO
Anna Olivieri
AF
Alessandro Fichera
GO
Gonzalo Oteo-Garcia
ZZ
Zafarina Zainuddin
KK
Ken Khong Eng
WP
William Pomat
JB
Jarosław Bryk
LP
Luísa Pereira
HF
Helen Farr
MP
Maria Pala
SJ
Stephen J Oppenheimer
MB
Martin B Richards
PS
Pedro Soares
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

The most widely accepted model for the colonization of Remote Oceania by Austronesian-speaking bearers of the Lapita complex ~ 3 ka (3000 years ago) links it to a broader Neolithic expansion from China, via Taiwan, ~ 4.5-6 ka. However, analyses of mitochondrial DNA haplogroup B4a1a1a, prevalent among Remote Oceanians today, have both supported and challenged this scenario. Here, we analyze 1364 B4a1a1 mitogenomes (234 novel) from 68 islands and compare age estimates with radiocarbon dates for colonization. We estimate the settlement of Remote Oceania ~ 3.2 [2.7; 3.75] ka, matching radiocarbon ages, and then extrapolate the age in Near Oceania. B4a1a1a arose around the northern coasts of New Guinea at least 6 ka, following Early Holocene dispersals from Asia. Technological advances (e.g., in sailing), fueled by interaction networks alongside the arrival of Late Holocene migrants from Taiwan or ISEA and putative environmental changes, likely triggered the expansion of Lapita colonists carrying B4a1a1a from New Guinea into Remote Oceania.

Chapter III

AI-Generated Summary

AI-generated by DNAGENICS

Independent AI summary of ancestry and genetic findings from the published study

Important: This summary is AI-generated by DNAGENICS for informational purposes only. It was not created by, affiliated with, or endorsed by the researchers behind the original publication, and is based solely on that published research. It may contain errors or omissions. DNAGENICS disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies or consequences arising from use of this information. Verify all information against the original publication. This is not professional scientific review or medical advice.

Summary

Key Findings

Ancestry Insights

Traits Analysis

Historical Context