Menu
Research Publication

A morphological analysis of the modern human frontal bone from Hahnöfersand, Germany.

Röding Carolin, C Profico, Antonio A et al.

41998075 PubMed ID
6 Authors
2026-04-17 Published
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

RC
Röding Carolin
CP
C Profico
AA
Antonio A
MM
Merkel Michael
MH
M Harvati
KK
Katerina K
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Frontal bone morphology is considered informative concerning phylogenetic and taxonomic affinities in hominin fossils. However, evaluating individual frontal bone features, especially macroscopically and with qualitative data, can produce contradictory results. One example is the enigmatic frontal bone from Hahnöfersand, Germany, initially dated to ca. 36 ka. A previous description of this specimen found that it exhibits a mix of modern human- and Neanderthal-like features and interpreted it as a potential hybrid between Homo neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens. In this case study, we apply a nearly landmark-free technique (i.e., surface registration) to reassess Hahnöfersand’s supposed intermediate morphology in the context of a revised chronology of ca. 7.5 ka. A three-dimensional comparative analysis was conducted using a dataset of Neanderthals, Middle Pleistocene European hominins, and a diverse Homo sapiens sample. Principal components analysis, Mahalanobis distances, and pairwise Procrustes distances place Hahnöfersand within the variability of Holocene Homo sapiens, with no evidence of intermediate morphology. These findings support Hahnöfersand’s attribution to recent Homo sapiens and highlight the efficacy of the surface registration method for morphological assessments of taxonomy in isolated fragmentary remains, where interpretation is driven entirely by the preserved morphology and, if available, dating.The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-026-48468-5.

Chapter III

Analysis

Comprehensive review of ancestry and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Summary

Key Findings

Ancestry Insights

Traits Analysis

Historical Context

Scientific Assessment