Menu
Currency
Research Publication

MarkerMatch: a Proximity-Based Probe-Matching Algorithm for Joint Analysis of Copy-Number Variants from Different Genotyping Arrays.

Ivankovic Franjo, F Yu, Dongmei D et al.

42178371 PubMed ID
20 Authors
2026-05-24 Published
0 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

IF
Ivankovic Franjo
FY
F Yu
DD
Dongmei D
SJ
Shen James
JZ
J Zhan
LL
Lingyu L
NM
Niarchou Maria
MK
M Kaylor
AA
Ariadne A
DL
Domènech Laura
LM
L Miller-Fleming
TW
Tyne W TW
PL
Porras Luz M
LG
LM Giusti-Rodríguez
PP
Paola P
OR
Ophoff Roel A
RS
RA Scharf
JM
Jeremiah M JM
MC
Mathews Carol A
C
CA
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Copy-number variants (CNVs) are a form of genetic structural variation with increasing importance in complex human disorders. Both DNA sequencing and microarray data can be used to detect CNVs, which can be used in genetic association tests. Unlike genotypes, CNV detection in microarrays requires the use of observed intensity signals at each probe, which limits the imputability for analyses that span multiple array types. Thus far, a consensus set of probes (those present on all arrays) has been used to circumvent the problem of differing array-specific sensitivities. This has led to excessive reduction in overall sensitivity since arrays can have an undesirably low probe overlap. To overcome this limitation, we developed MarkerMatch, a proximity-based algorithm that matches probes across different genotyping microarrays to maximize the number of probes considered in the CNV calling algorithm, thereby increasing the resolution and sensitivity while preserving precision.By analyzing CNV calls from 4,906 individuals genotyped across three different arrays, we show that the MarkerMatch approach improves sensitivity by increasing the density of probes available for CNV calling while maintaining precision or improving it relative to the current practice (e.g., use of consensus probes only). We further demonstrate that MarkerMatch matches the CNV detection from current practice in terms of F1 score and PPV for larger CNVs. We also optimize MarkerMatch parameters, DMAX and Method, and find an optimal DMAX setting at 10 kb, with no clear optimal candidate based on Method, indicating that parameters for this metric should be determined on a use case basis.The R package for MarkerMatch is available at: https://github.com/FranjoIM/MarkerMatch. The code used for analysis and implementation is available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18460979. The live notebook is available at https://fivankovic.notion.site/2026-markermatch.Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Chapter III

Analysis

Comprehensive review of ancestry and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the ancestry and genetic findings discussed in this research.