Menu
Currency
GWAS Study

The TCF7L2 diabetes risk variant is associated with HbA₁(C) levels: a genome-wide association meta-analysis.

Franklin CS, Aulchenko YS, Huffman JE et al.

20849430 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
1782 Participants
205 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

FC
Franklin CS
AY
Aulchenko YS
HJ
Huffman JE
VV
Vitart V
HC
Hayward C
PO
Polašek O
KS
Knott S
ZL
Zgaga L
ZT
Zemunik T
RI
Rudan I
CH
Campbell H
WA
Wright AF
WS
Wild SH
WJ
Wilson JF
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Genome-wide association (GWA) studies have identified around 20 common genetic variants influencing the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Likewise, a number of variants have been associated with diabetes-related quantitative glycaemic traits, but to date the overlap between these genes and variants has been low. The majority of genetic studies have focused on fasting plasma glucose levels; however, this measure is highly variable. We have conducted a GWA meta-analysis of glycated haemoglobin (HbA₁(C) ) levels within three healthy nondiabetic populations. This phenotype provides an estimate of mean glucose levels over 2-3 months and is a more stable predictor of future diabetes risk. Participants were from three isolated populations: the Orkney Isles in the north of Scotland, the Dalmatian islands of Vis, and Korčula in Croatia (total of 1782 nondiabetic subjects). Association was tested in each population and results combined by meta-analysis. The strongest association was with the TCF7L2 gene (rs7903146, P= 1.48 × 10⁻⁷). This is also the strongest common genetic risk factor for T2D but it has not been identified in previous genome-wide studies of glycated haemoglobin.

1,782 European ancestry individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

1782
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
U.K., Croatia
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

AI-Generated Summary

AI-generated by DNAGENICS

Independent AI summary of health and genetic findings from the published study

Important: This summary is AI-generated by DNAGENICS for informational purposes only. It was not created by, affiliated with, or endorsed by the researchers behind the original publication, and is based solely on that published research. It may contain errors or omissions. DNAGENICS disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies or consequences arising from use of this information. Verify all information against the original publication. This is not professional scientific review or medical advice.

AI Summary In Progress

Our AI-generated summary of this publication is being prepared. Please check back soon.