Menu
Currency
GWAS Study

A genome-wide association study identifies only two ancestry specific variants associated with spontaneous preterm birth.

Rappoport N, Toung J, Hadley D et al.

29317701 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
18802 Participants
85 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

RN
Rappoport N
TJ
Toung J
HD
Hadley D
WR
Wong RJ
FK
Fujioka K
RJ
Reuter J
AC
Abbott CW
OS
Oh S
HD
Hu D
EC
Eng C
HS
Huntsman S
BD
Bodian DL
NJ
Niederhuber JE
HX
Hong X
ZG
Zhang G
SW
Sikora-Wohfeld W
GC
Gignoux CR
WH
Wang H
OJ
Oehlert J
JL
Jelliffe-Pawlowski LL
GJ
Gould JB
DG
Darmstadt GL
WX
Wang X
BC
Bustamante CD
SM
Snyder MP
ZE
Ziv E
PN
Patsopoulos NA
ML
Muglia LJ
BE
Burchard E
SG
Shaw GM
OH
O'Brodovich HM
SD
Stevenson DK
BA
Butte AJ
SM
Sirota M
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Preterm birth (PTB), or the delivery prior to 37 weeks of gestation, is a significant cause of infant morbidity and mortality. Although twin studies estimate that maternal genetic contributions account for approximately 30% of the incidence of PTB, and other studies reported fetal gene polymorphism association, to date no consistent associations have been identified. In this study, we performed the largest reported genome-wide association study analysis on 1,349 cases of PTB and 12,595 ancestry-matched controls from the focusing on genomic fetal signals. We tested over 2 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for associations with PTB across five subpopulations: African (AFR), the Americas (AMR), European, South Asian, and East Asian. We identified only two intergenic loci associated with PTB at a genome-wide level of significance: rs17591250 (P = 4.55E-09) on chromosome 1 in the AFR population and rs1979081 (P = 3.72E-08) on chromosome 8 in the AMR group. We have queried several existing replication cohorts and found no support of these associations. We conclude that the fetal genetic contribution to PTB is unlikely due to single common genetic variant, but could be explained by interactions of multiple common variants, or of rare variants affected by environmental influences, all not detectable using a GWAS alone.

260 European ancestry cases, 190 African-American cases, 745 Hispanic cases, 131 East Asian ancestry cases, 23 South East Asian ancestry cases, 9,630 European ancestry controls, 1,684 African-American controls, 1,102 Hispanic controls, 118 East Asian ancestry controls, 36 South East Asian ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

18802
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
Yes
Replicated
145 African American cases, 307 Latino cases, 82 European ancestry cases, 1,274 African American controls, 2,826 Hispanic / Latino controls, 249 European ancestry controls
Replication Participants
Hispanic or Latin American, European, East Asian, African American or Afro-Caribbean, South East Asian
Ancestry
U.S., Puerto Rico
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

AI-Generated Summary

AI-generated by DNAGENICS

Independent AI summary of health and genetic findings from the published study

Important: This summary is AI-generated by DNAGENICS for informational purposes only. It was not created by, affiliated with, or endorsed by the researchers behind the original publication, and is based solely on that published research. It may contain errors or omissions. DNAGENICS disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies or consequences arising from use of this information. Verify all information against the original publication. This is not professional scientific review or medical advice.

AI Summary In Progress

Our AI-generated summary of this publication is being prepared. Please check back soon.