Menu
Currency
GWAS Study

GWAS and PheWAS of red blood cell components in a Northern Nevadan cohort.

Read RW, Schlauch KA, Elhanan G et al.

31194788 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
4675 Participants
85 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

RR
Read RW
SK
Schlauch KA
EG
Elhanan G
MW
Metcalf WJ
SA
Slonim AD
AR
Aweti R
BR
Borkowski R
GJ
Grzymski JJ
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

In this study, we perform a full genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify statistically significantly associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with three red blood cell (RBC) components and follow it with two independent PheWASs to examine associations between phenotypic data (case-control status of diagnoses or disease), significant SNPs, and RBC component levels. We first identified associations between the three RBC components: mean platelet volume (MPV), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and platelet counts (PC), and the genotypes of approximately 500,000 SNPs on the Illumina Infimum DNA Human OmniExpress-24 BeadChip using a single cohort of 4,673 Northern Nevadans. Twenty-one SNPs in five major genomic regions were found to be statistically significantly associated with MPV, two regions with MCV, and one region with PC, with p<5x10-8. Twenty-nine SNPs and nine chromosomal regions were identified in 30 previous GWASs, with effect sizes of similar magnitude and direction as found in our cohort. The two strongest associations were SNP rs1354034 with MPV (p = 2.4x10-13) and rs855791 with MCV (p = 5.2x10-12). We then examined possible associations between these significant SNPs and incidence of 1,488 phenotype groups mapped from International Classification of Disease version 9 and 10 (ICD9 and ICD10) codes collected in the extensive electronic health record (EHR) database associated with Healthy Nevada Project consented participants. Further leveraging data collected in the EHR, we performed an additional PheWAS to identify associations between continuous red blood cell (RBC) component measures and incidence of specific diagnoses. The first PheWAS illuminated whether SNPs associated with RBC components in our cohort were linked with other hematologic phenotypic diagnoses or diagnoses of other nature. Although no SNPs from our GWAS were identified as strongly associated to other phenotypic components, a number of associations were identified with p-values ranging between 1x10-3 and 1x10-4 with traits such as respiratory failure, sleep disorders, hypoglycemia, hyperglyceridemia, GERD and IBS. The second PheWAS examined possible phenotypic predictors of abnormal RBC component measures: a number of hematologic phenotypes such as thrombocytopenia, anemias, hemoglobinopathies and pancytopenia were found to be strongly associated to RBC component measures; additional phenotypes such as (morbid) obesity, malaise and fatigue, alcoholism, and cirrhosis were also identified to be possible predictors of RBC component measures.

Up to 53 African American individuals, 100 Asian ancestry individuals, 4,175 European ancestry individuals, 138 Hispanic or Latin American individuals, 30 Native American individuals, 11 Pacific Islander ancestry individuals, 168 unknown ancestry individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

4675
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
Asian unspecified, European, Hispanic or Latin American, Oceanian, African American or Afro-Caribbean, Native American
Ancestry
U.S.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

AI-Generated Summary

AI-generated by DNAGENICS

Independent AI summary of health and genetic findings from the published study

Important: This summary is AI-generated by DNAGENICS for informational purposes only. It was not created by, affiliated with, or endorsed by the researchers behind the original publication, and is based solely on that published research. It may contain errors or omissions. DNAGENICS disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies or consequences arising from use of this information. Verify all information against the original publication. This is not professional scientific review or medical advice.

AI Summary In Progress

Our AI-generated summary of this publication is being prepared. Please check back soon.