Menu
Currency
GWAS Study

Rare variant analyses across multiethnic cohorts identify novel genes for refractive error.

Musolf AM, Haarman AEG, Luben RN et al.

36596879 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
27006 Participants
158 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

MA
Musolf AM
HA
Haarman AEG
LR
Luben RN
OJ
Ong JS
PK
Patasova K
TR
Trapero RH
MJ
Marsh J
JI
Jain I
JR
Jain R
WP
Wang PZ
LD
Lewis DD
TM
Tedja MS
IA
Iglesias AI
LH
Li H
CC
Cowan CS
BG
Biino G
KA
Klein AP
DP
Duggal P
MD
Mackey DA
HC
Hayward C
HT
Haller T
MA
Metspalu A
WJ
Wedenoja J
PO
Pärssinen O
CC
Cheng CY
SS
Saw SM
SD
Stambolian D
HP
Hysi PG
KA
Khawaja AP
VV
Vitart V
HC
Hammond CJ
VD
van Duijn CM
VV
Verhoeven VJM
KC
Klaver CCW
BJ
Bailey-Wilson JE
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Refractive error, measured here as mean spherical equivalent (SER), is a complex eye condition caused by both genetic and environmental factors. Individuals with strong positive or negative values of SER require spectacles or other approaches for vision correction. Common genetic risk factors have been identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS), but a great part of the refractive error heritability is still missing. Some of this heritability may be explained by rare variants (minor allele frequency [MAF] ≤ 0.01.). We performed multiple gene-based association tests of mean Spherical Equivalent with rare variants in exome array data from the Consortium for Refractive Error and Myopia (CREAM). The dataset consisted of over 27,000 total subjects from five cohorts of Indo-European and Eastern Asian ethnicity. We identified 129 unique genes associated with refractive error, many of which were replicated in multiple cohorts. Our best novel candidates included the retina expressed PDCD6IP, the circadian rhythm gene PER3, and P4HTM, which affects eye morphology. Future work will include functional studies and validation. Identification of genes contributing to refractive error and future understanding of their function may lead to better treatment and prevention of refractive errors, which themselves are important risk factors for various blinding conditions.

27,006 European, Asian unspecified ancestry individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

27006
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European, Asian unspecified
Ancestry
Netherlands, Singapore, U.S., Finland, Italy, U.K., Australia, Croatia, Estonia
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

AI-Generated Summary

AI-generated by DNAGENICS

Independent AI summary of health and genetic findings from the published study

Important: This summary is AI-generated by DNAGENICS for informational purposes only. It was not created by, affiliated with, or endorsed by the researchers behind the original publication, and is based solely on that published research. It may contain errors or omissions. DNAGENICS disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies or consequences arising from use of this information. Verify all information against the original publication. This is not professional scientific review or medical advice.

AI Summary In Progress

Our AI-generated summary of this publication is being prepared. Please check back soon.