Menu
mtDNA Haplogroup • Maternal Lineage

C4C

mtDNA Haplogroup C4C

~13,000 years ago
Northeast Asia / Beringia
0 subclades
1 ancient samples
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

The Story

The journey of mtDNA haplogroup C4C

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup C4C (commonly seen as C4c in many papers) is a downstream branch of the broader C4 cluster, which itself arose in northern Eurasia during the Late Pleistocene. Given the phylogenetic position of C4C relative to other C4 subclades and its modern and ancient geographic occurrences, it most plausibly originated in the northeastern Asian / Beringian region around the Late Pleistocene to Early Holocene (on the order of ~10–15 kya). This timing is consistent with post‑glacial population movements, regional isolation in Beringia, and subsequent dispersals into North America and across northern Eurasia.

Molecular-clock estimates for specific C4 sublineages vary by study and calibration method; therefore the age given here is a reasoned synthesis based on the parent C4 age (commonly estimated near ~20 kya) and observed diversity within C4C/C4c specifically. The lineage shows low but geographically informative diversity, consistent with a relatively localized origin followed by small‑scale expansions and founder events.

Subclades (if applicable)

C4C itself is a relatively narrow branch within the C4 phylogeny. In many population studies it is treated in the same category as C4c (lowercase), and reported substructure within C4c is limited compared with larger C4 subclades (e.g., C4a). Where internal variation is observed, it often reflects geographically restricted founder events (for example, distinct private variants in certain Siberian groups or in particular Native American populations). Ancient DNA sampling remains sparse for this specific branch, so additional subclades may be discovered with broader ancient and modern sequencing.

Geographical Distribution

Modern distribution: C4C is uncommon but geographically informative. It is found at low–moderate frequencies in northeastern Siberian populations (e.g., some Yakut, Evenk, and other Tungusic groups), and detected in certain Mongolic/Tungusic and Central Asian groups at low frequencies. Importantly, a C4C/C4c lineage is documented among some Indigenous North American populations—particularly in northern and northwestern North America—supporting a role of this branch in Beringian‑adjacent peopling events. Occasional low frequency occurrences have also been reported in East Asian populations and in Arctic/sub‑Arctic groups (including contexts tied to Yupik/Inuit migrations).

Ancient DNA: C4C is rare in published ancient datasets but has been observed in at least one archaeological sample in available databases, reinforcing the lineage's antiquity in high‑latitude Eurasia and its relevance to prehistoric population movements across Beringia.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because of its distribution, C4C serves as a maternal marker for northern Asian hunter‑gatherer ancestries and for the coastal/near‑coastal Beringian corridor that contributed to the peopling of the Americas. It is therefore informative in studies of:

  • post‑glacial recolonization and refugia in Siberia and Beringia
  • early Holocene northward and eastward expansions of small hunter‑gatherer groups
  • maternal lineages associated with some Paleoindian and later Arctic cultural traditions

While not tied to a single large archaeological culture like Yamnaya or Bell Beaker, C4C is associated with Paleo‑Arctic / Beringian contexts, localized Neolithic hunter‑gatherer assemblages in Siberia, and the early population history of North America.

Conclusion

C4C is a narrowly distributed, low‑diversity descendant of C4 that captures a slice of northern Eurasian and near‑Beringian maternal history. Its presence in both Siberia and parts of North America highlights the close population connections across Beringia during the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene. As ancient DNA sampling increases in northeastern Asia and Arctic North America, the phylogeography and internal structure of C4C/C4c may become clearer, improving resolution on timing and routes of past maternal migrations.

(Notes on uncertainty: specific internal branching and precise coalescence ages for C4C/C4c vary between studies; statements above synthesize published geographic patterns and reasonable phylogenetic inference.)

Key Points

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Chapter II

Tree & Relationships

Phylogenetic context and subclades

Evolution Path

This haplogroup's evolutionary journey from its earliest ancestor to the present.

Steps Haplogroup Age Estimate Archaeology Era Time Passed Immediate Descendants Tested Modern Descendants Ancient Connections
1 C4C Current ~13,000 years ago 🏹 Mesolithic 13,000 years 0 0 1
2 C4 ~20,000 years ago 🏹 Mesolithic 20,000 years 7 34 48
3 C ~35,000 years ago 🦴 Paleolithic 35,000 years 5 617 75

Subclades (0)

Terminal branch - no known subclades

Siblings (6)

Other branches from the same parent haplogroup

Chapter III

Where in the World

Geographic distribution and modern presence

Place of Origin

Northeast Asia / Beringia

Modern Distribution

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup C4C is found include:

  1. Indigenous peoples of the Americas (certain Native American groups, especially in northern/northwestern North America)
  2. Siberian ethnic groups (e.g., Yakut, Evenk, Nenets, Chukchi and other northern Siberian groups)
  3. Mongolic and Tungusic‑speaking populations (e.g., some Buryats, Mongolians, Evens)
  4. East Asian populations (low frequencies in some Han, Koreans, Japanese in isolated instances)
  5. Central Asian populations (e.g., occasional reports in Kazakhs, Altaians, Tuvans)
  6. Arctic and sub‑Arctic peoples (e.g., lineages in Yupik/Inuit‑adjacent regions and other Beringia‑linked groups)
  7. Occasional occurrences in ancient or historically admixed contexts in northern and eastern Europe
CHAPTER IV

When in Time

Your haplogroup in the context of human history

~13k years ago

Haplogroup C4C

Your mtDNA haplogroup emerged in Northeast Asia / Beringia

Northeast Asia / Beringia
~10k years ago

Neolithic Revolution

Agriculture begins, settled communities form

~5k years ago

Bronze Age

Metalworking, writing, and early civilizations

~3k years ago

Iron Age

Iron tools, expanded trade networks

~2k years ago

Classical Antiquity

Greek and Roman civilizations flourish

Present

Present Day

Modern era

Your Haplogroup
Historical Era
Chapter IV-B

Linked Cultures

Ancient cultures associated with mtDNA haplogroup C4C

Cultural Heritage

These ancient cultures have been linked to haplogroup C4C based on matching ancient DNA samples from archaeological excavations. The presence of this haplogroup in these cultures provides insights into the migrations and population movements of populations carrying this haplogroup.

Altai-Sayan Early Buryat Kitoi Culture Namazga Ob River Ob River Culture Sambaqui Shamanka Culture Siberian Paleolithic
Culture assignments are based on archaeological context of ancient DNA samples and may represent regional associations during specific time periods.
Chapter V

Sample Catalog

1 direct carrier of haplogroup C4C

1 / 1 samples
Portrait Sample Country Era Date Culture mtDNA Match
Portrait of ancient individual PAI001 from Brazil, dated 7315 BCE - 7047 BCE
PAI001
Brazil Sambaqui Culture 7315 BCE - 7047 BCE Sambaqui C4c Direct
Chapter VI

Carrier Distribution Map

Geographic distribution of 1 ancient DNA sample (direct and subclade carriers of C4C)

Direct carrier
Time Period Filter
All Time Periods
Showing all samples
Chapter VII

Temporal Distribution

Distribution of carriers across archaeological periods

Chapter VIII

Geographic Distribution

Distribution by country of origin (direct and subclade carriers shown by default)

Chapter IX

Country × Era Distribution

Cross-tabulation of carrier countries and archaeological periods (direct and subclade carriers shown by default)

Data

Data & Provenance

Source information and data quality

Last Updated 2026-02-16
Confidence Score 50/100
Coverage Low
Data Source

We use the latest phylotree for MTDNA haplogroup classification and data.