Menu
Research Publication

Language continuity despite population replacement in Remote Oceania

Posth C, Nägele K, Colleran H et al.

29487365 PubMed ID
29 Authors
2018 Apr Published
28 Samples
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

PC
Posth C
NK
Nägele K
CH
Colleran H
VF
Valentin F
BS
Bedford S
KK
Kami KW
SR
Shing R
BH
Buckley H
KR
Kinaston R
WM
Walworth M
CG
Clark GR
RC
Reepmeyer C
FJ
Flexner J
MT
Maric T
MJ
Moser J
GJ
Gresky J
KL
Kiko L
RK
Robson KJ
AK
Auckland K
OS
Oppenheimer SJ
HA
Hill AVS
MA
Mentzer AJ
ZJ
Zech J
PF
Petchey F
RP
Roberts P
JC
Jeong C
GR
Gray RD
KJ
Krause J
PA
Powell A
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Recent genomic analyses show that the earliest peoples reaching Remote Oceania-associated with Austronesian-speaking Lapita culture-were almost completely East Asian, without detectable Papuan ancestry. However, Papuan-related genetic ancestry is found across present-day Pacific populations, indicating that peoples from Near Oceania have played a significant, but largely unknown, ancestral role. Here, new genome-wide data from 19 ancient South Pacific individuals provide direct evidence of a so-far undescribed Papuan expansion into Remote Oceania starting ~2,500 yr BP, far earlier than previously estimated and supporting a model from historical linguistics. New genome-wide data from 27 contemporary ni-Vanuatu demonstrate a subsequent and almost complete replacement of Lapita-Austronesian by Near Oceanian ancestry. Despite this massive demographic change, incoming Papuan languages did not replace Austronesian languages. Population replacement with language continuity is extremely rare-if not unprecedented-in human history. Our analyses show that rather than one large-scale event, the process was incremental and complex, with repeated migrations and sex-biased admixture with peoples from the Bismarck Archipelago.

Chapter III

Ancient DNA Samples

28 ancient DNA samples referenced in this publication

28 Samples
Sample ID Date/Era Country Locality Sex mtDNA Y-DNA
TAP002 1657 CE French Polynesia French Polynesia. Ra'iatea M B4a1a1m1 C-M38
TAP004 1645 CE French Polynesia French Polynesia. Ra'iatea M B4a1a1-c C-M38
TAP002 1657 CE French Polynesia French Polynesia. Ra'iatea M B4a1a1m1 C-M38
TAP004 1645 CE French Polynesia French Polynesia. Ra'iatea M B4a1a1-c C-M38
TAP003 1508 CE French Polynesia French Polynesia. Ra'iatea M B4a1a1c C-M38
MAI002 1431 CE Solomon Islands Malaita F B4a1a1a
MAI002 1431 CE Solomon Islands Malaita F B4a1a1a
TON001 850 BCE Tonga Talasiu site. Tongatapu F B4a1a1a
TON002 850 BCE Tonga Talasiu site. Tongatapu M B4a1a1 O-F157
TON001 850 BCE Tonga Talasiu site. Tongatapu F B4a1a1a
TON002 850 BCE Tonga Talasiu site. Tongatapu M B4a1a1 O-F157
LHA001 1034 CE Tonga Tongatapu F B4a1a1
FUT001 688 CE Vanuatu Futuna F P1d2a
MAL001 399 BCE Vanuatu Malakula F B4a1a1
MAL006 811 BCE Vanuatu Malakula F B4a1a1a11
MAL008 399 BCE Vanuatu Malakula F B4a1a1a
FUT001 688 CE Vanuatu Futuna F P1d2a
FUT002 651 CE Vanuatu Futuna F M28b1
FUT006 680 CE Vanuatu Futuna M P1d2a S-M230
FUT007 681 CE Vanuatu Futuna M M28b1 S-P315
MAL007 163 BCE Vanuatu Malakula F B4a1a1a
MAL001 399 BCE Vanuatu Malakula F B4a1a1
MAL008 399 BCE Vanuatu Malakula F B4a1a1a
MAL002 755 BCE Vanuatu Malakula F B4a1a1a
TAN002 680 BCE Vanuatu Tanna M Q2a M-M5
MAL004 772 BCE Vanuatu Malakula M B4a1a1a M-M5
MAL006 811 BCE Vanuatu Malakula F B4a1a1a11
TAN001 1661 CE Vanuatu Tanna M P1d1 O-F15980
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of ancestry and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Summary

Key Findings

Ancestry Insights

Traits Analysis

Historical Context

Scientific Assessment